Valve Developer Community:Administrators' noticeboard

This is the discussion page of Valve Developer Community:Administrators' noticeboard. To add a comment, use the Edit button near the headline of the appropriate section. To create a new section, you can use the Add topic button at the top of this page.
Comments on talk pages should be signed with "~~~~", which will be converted into your signature and a timestamp.

New uploading file formats

Can you change the whitelist of files? Or is the current situation due to technical limitations that do not allow, for example, sounds to work properly?

For example, we really miss SVG (actually, we found a replacement, but it increases the size of the files) and OGG (func_button). -- THE OWL 13:38, 18 Jun 2024 (UTC)

I don't have the ability to change this. PabloS

(talk) 09:21, 18 June 2024 (PDT)

MediaWiki:Common.css

Can you please add the below lines to the CSS? This will allow people to better understand what is clickable and what is not.

.vdc-island-link { position: relative }

.vdc-island-link::before {
	content:"";
	width: 100%;
	height: 100%;
	background-color: rgb(255 255 255 / 3%);
	opacity: 0;
	transition: 30ms;
	pointer-events: none;
	position: absolute;
	top: 0;
	left: 0
}

.vdc-island-link:hover::before { opacity: 1 }

.vdc-island-link:active::before { opacity: .7 }

Example

https://valvedevelopercommunity.github.io/storage/example

--THE OWL 21:53, 18 Jun 2024 (UTC)

Could you show me a page (or pages) where .vdc-island-link is used? PabloS (talk) 19:02, 18 June 2024 (PDT)

At the moment, there are no such pages. This is just my idea to improve interaction with interactive blocks and interactive buttons. It is not always clear what you can click on, and such a primitive effect at least a little, but will help in fixing this problem.

From the examples of using the new class I can cite the button in the Valve Technology template and also the buttons on the main page redirecting to the tools documentation. -- THE OWL 6:58, 19 Jun 2024 (UTC)

I've slightly updated the example content and added an effect when the HTML element is clicked. Useful for interactive buttons. --THE OWL 7:58, 19 Jun 2024 (UTC)

Another 'solution' to a problem that isn't real. This is how we arrived at the current situation with the wrecked article programming. The techbro tweaking mentality.

There's very few of these buttons in use (are there any outside the main page?) and they may as well just be rewritten to have links in them that get underlined when hovered upon.

(Not to mention, the cursor literally changes when hovering over them. What's not clear?)

Buttons that change text as shown in the current example, this 'jumpy' effect, is unappealing and again, I'll stress, it's this desperate tweaking/modernisation urges "just because".

(And knowing them, they'll make it look up more and more strings, it'll be a mess again like we have currently...)

You first should show that there's a user case, or better, a consensus formed, that there is an issue to begin with. Cvoxalury (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2024 (PDT)

(are there any outside the main page?)

Any software page and any article. The translation tools at the top also have buttons. A lot of things here have buttons.

Not to mention, the cursor literally changes when hovering over them. What's not clear?

Oh, really? tell that to all modern designers. Somehow they are not happy with this kind of crap. For some reason, everyone is trying to clearly show that this is a link. That's stupid, isn't it? Is it just me or are you sitting on Windows 98 right now and endlessly enjoying its interface? You are not even satisfied with the most common animation when you hover your mouse over something you click on. I admit that the example may not be the best, but it still shows the main thing - background highlighting on mouseover and background highlighting on click (classic thing).

Then why do we need colored buttons and all that? Let's switch to plain text with simple blue links? Seriously, explaining the purpose of such a simple effect is silly. I can explain why I wrote the styles this way, no more than that. --THE OWL 11:38, 19 Jun 2024 (UTC)

The strawman 'modern designers' are not here. Any sane web developer cries when they see the mess you've made. The admin you are appealing to already called your work 'unholy' and called you out for singlehandedly wreaking havok.

And we don't need coloured buttons! They are only on the main page because YOU started this. On 99.9% of pages they are not used and never going to be used.

You are hyperbolising as if blue links are somehow bad. But they are the most common and normal type and will stay that way. Cvoxalury (talk) 04:50, 19 June 2024 (PDT)

When are you going to stop accusing me of something I didn't do? Are you sure you were here until at least 2024? These buttons are 20 years old, we just tweaked the colors of the colored buttons a bit (actually, I made them much less contrasty, the current state of them is not to my credit).

I know what you mean, I'm just messing with you. So I promise this will be fixed too, if your sandbox page ends up not being finished before I get back. I'd describe everything in detail, but this wiki is very inconvenient to work with on a small screen, and I don't really have a lot of time to do it. Right now, I'm just proposing a simple idea. --User:THE OWL 11:58, 19 Jun 2024 (UTC)

The buttons weren't buttons, they were just coloured rectangles. The links in them were usual clickable links.

I'm just messing with you - ah, there we go. We can finally pin regular trolling on you, with this evidence. Cvoxalury (talk) 05:02, 19 June 2024 (PDT)

The example in the link is terrible. You seem to have a consistent problem where all your suggestions are based on what you think looks flashy or flexes your knowledge of html code, instead of providing concise, accessible and clear navigation. Microsoft has figured out a solution for hovering over items decades ago - a background highlight or a slight border.A. Shift (talk) 01:28, 19 June 2024 (PDT)

I suggested this code only because I don’t want to be asked to add something a bunch of times in the future. I just wrote a universal thing that can be applied to an object with any style.

This is the most common background highlighting that most modern sites use, simply written so that we can use it on any type of interactive element.

This can be accomplished in a number of ways, but I chose this one because this effect needs to be applied to any style, and filters are kind of disliked here. --THE OWL 11:35, 19 Jun 2024 (UTC)

You are already not being asked to add something. You are being asked to stop doing what you are doing.

What 'any type of interactive element' do we need? What do we even use? The most common 'interactive element' is a link. The next common is collapsable categories. Neither need anything special. If it works well, don't change it. Stop with the additions. Cvoxalury (talk) 04:50, 19 June 2024 (PDT)

The particular issue should be resolved for now. If more issues arise, don't hesistate to let us know. Peter Brev (talk) 10:28, 19 June 2024 (PDT)

System messages that could be very useful: MediaWiki:Lang

I’ve already suggested creating a MediaWiki:Lang page on its talk page. The idea behind MediaWiki:Lang is to get rid of the heavy {{Uselang}} template and add native support for all languages, not just those that can be accessed through {{Uselang}}. By doing this through a system message, it will be possible to reduce the load on many pages on the site, since now many templates depend on {{Uselang}}. Do not forget that {{Uselang}} is a template that can be edited by anyone (especially for the purpose of vandalism) and thus the site can go down.

I have compiled a list of all message pages and what codes need to be entered in them. Some pages have different codes. There are reasons for this. For example, you can read this material https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special_language_codes to better understand why, for example, als lang is actually gsw. If I made a mistake in any of the languages, feel free to edit it directly in my message, I will be glad. However, do not forget to write the reason why I made a mistake in a particular language.

I know it’s a big list, but I think it’s better to do it once and not come back to it again. --Max34 (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2024 (PDT)

Request to add to MediaWiki:Common.css

PabloS, can you add the below code to MediaWiki:Common.css? It fixes the horrible gradient in the search box in the top right corner.

#simpleSearch {
	background-size: contain;
}

-THE OWL (talk) 12:13, 17 July 2024 (PDT)

Adding Community Portal to the main sidebar

Valve Developer Community:Community portal is being updated to be more useful. It'd be nice to have it accessible right from the sidebar. Maybe about "Getting Help" - they're closely related? Cvoxalury (talk) 08:13, 18 July 2024 (PDT)

Category namespace has subpages disabled with recent wiki updates

Would be preferable to enable subpages on Category namespace as there are templates relying on {{ROOTPAGENAME}} use --Nescius (talk) 15:30, 3 December 2024 (PST)

Will take a look. --JeffLane (talk) 13:46, 4 December 2024 (PST)

This should be now fixed. --JeffLane (talk) 13:34, 9 December 2024 (PST)

Installing Scribunto

With an updated version of MediaWiki having been installed, I would assume someone has access to the wiki's server. Is it now possible to install extensions? If so, I would suggest installing Scribunto, which allows for the creation of Lua modules, much like those used on Wikipedia and the TF2 wiki. Many templates are currently very tedious to update or hard to read (see {{this is a/category}}, {{str sub long}}, and {{delink}}). ―Pee (talk) 11:04, 5 December 2024 (PST)

External images are not working

External images are not working after wiki update --Kpabik (talk) 02:23, 8 December 2024 (PST)

Please explain why you consider this necessary or even desirable. There are good reasons to have all content directly accessible on the VDC and not under the control of external sources. --JeffLane (talk)

Special:ListFiles no longer have a search feature

This page no longer have a "Search for media name" feature, likely because of new MediaWiki update that was done recently. Can anyone add this feature back? --leonidakarlach (talk) 04:01, 23 December 2024 (PST)

You should be able to use the regular search option, then deselect all namespaces except for File: ―Pee (talk) 12:28, 27 December 2024 (PST)

The Multimedia category can be used. --JeffLane (talk) 07:34, 5 January 2025 (PST)

Audio Support

Can someone in administration change the whitelist of files on the upload page? Sounds are on the official Team Fortress 2 wiki, but not here, although a lot of things (soundscapes, default button sounds, etc.) should be included in the wiki so people don't have to open VPK or search for the right sound on Youtube.
I think OGG support would be more than enough. Not everyone will like converting WAV to OGG, but if the wiki has very limited storage space, some convenience can be sacrificed.
I've previously made some moves towards merging the wiki with its namesake unofficial organization on GitHub (there was previously a template I created for embedding audio from third-party sources), but it's not that convenient for other people to use, and splitting one site into a bunch of other sites isn't very efficient.
THE OWL (talk) 10:38, 30 December 2024 (PST)

About soundscapes: Open the game and enter playsoundscape. I don't want to know how many MB of sound would have to be uploaded to this wiki for the small convenience of not having to do that. Frankly, that would be a ridiculous decision.

About default button sounds: Use Hammer's sound browser. I understand that sound on this wiki would indeed be convenient for common/historical sounds like those, but where should one draw the line? This wiki obviously shouldn't contain all games' sounds.

I definitely disagree that sound 'should' be on the wiki. It 'could', but does it really 'need'? Allowing sound uploads is not a small deal. This wiki doesn't need to 'hold up' with other wikis, it's primarily for developers.

Can you name an instance where sound should definitely be on this wiki? --popcorn (talk) 20:44, 30 December 2024 (PST)

Well, I can still say that what you suggested is inconvenient (the game isn't always running, and the sound browser is awkward). I used that wiki at times when I was learning Hammer, and I always had to go to YouTube to find any sound. Those videos exist for a reason. Sounds are hard to find if you don't know how to do this (and there's no information about it on the sound pages), which YouTube has fixed.

As for file size, I've already written about this, giving an example as OGG, which is the default format in MediaWiki. Its use results in WAV compression by a factor of about 2, and in some situations 4. Soundscapes don't take a minute to listen to, and the OGG file size will only be 2 MB if the sound is 4 minutes long, or if the sound itself is extremely difficult to encode.

I think it would be fine to add a note on some pages like "Hey, look, you can play these sounds in a game or editor by doing this and this". That would make things easier too, but it's a lot less convenient than just listening here and now.

As for "this wiki isn't like other wikis", I didn't say we should add all sounds from Valve games. It would just be nicer for developers (especially newbies) to be able to play certain sounds on the page. Why would I need to go into the game or editor to listen to the sounds of a func_button entity if I'm already on its page? THE OWL (talk) 06:16, 1 January 2025 (PST)

Yes, it's not convenient, and that's the truth. Especially if it's for new people, then I wouldn't give them the convenience to be able to listen to just a handful of sounds here, but instead give them the tools to be able to listen to any game sound. And yes, these tips/instructions may be missing on the sound pages; That's something we can fix.

We don't need to talk about compression factors if the responsible people find that it's unnecessary filesize on this wiki. Note that I'm not one of them, but it's possible they think similar and don't consider discussing that with you because they may have more important things to do.

I think that's all I have to say about this. --popcorn (talk) 10:00, 1 January 2025 (PST)

This is unlikely to be added. --JeffLane (talk) 07:44, 5 January 2025 (PST)