Talk:CSTBSP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Why is it different from the std tools?== | == Why is it different from the std tools?== | ||
What makes this stand out from the current default tools? --[[User:Holtt|Holtt]] 19:39, 5 Jun 2006 (PDT) | What makes this stand out from the current default tools? --[[User:Holtt|Holtt]] 19:39, 5 Jun 2006 (PDT) | ||
:It's Amckernified, so it is optimized (TAKES LESS TIME)—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' 20:03, 5 Jun 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:03, 5 June 2006
Perhaps we need to include a ZHLT section with the other 2 compile programs of his? -Zevensoft
Dont worry about ZHLT - these tools dont work with source, and are well known with 95% of Half Life Devs - Also i only worked on ZHLT 3.0 - and am not zoner, merl, or cagey - who most of the credit should be pointing to -amckern
Porting to Linux
What is Zoners position on a Linux port of his tool suite? Or a better question might be, how would Zoner and team feel about someone porting the tools? -SavannahLion
- I am open to any one that has the time porting ZHLT to linux, and thats the main reason why i provide the source code on updates --Amckern 07:59, 28 May 2006 (PDT)
Why is it different from the std tools?
What makes this stand out from the current default tools? --Holtt 19:39, 5 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- It's Amckernified, so it is optimized (TAKES LESS TIME)—ts2do 20:03, 5 Jun 2006 (PDT)