Talk:CSTBSP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* I am open to any one that has the time porting ZHLT to linux, and thats the main reason why i provide the source code on updates --[[User:Amckern|Amckern]] 07:59, 28 May 2006 (PDT) | * I am open to any one that has the time porting ZHLT to linux, and thats the main reason why i provide the source code on updates --[[User:Amckern|Amckern]] 07:59, 28 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
== Why is it different from the std tools?== | |||
What makes this stand out from the current default tools? --[[User:Holtt|Holtt]] 19:39, 5 Jun 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:39, 5 June 2006
Perhaps we need to include a ZHLT section with the other 2 compile programs of his? -Zevensoft
Dont worry about ZHLT - these tools dont work with source, and are well known with 95% of Half Life Devs - Also i only worked on ZHLT 3.0 - and am not zoner, merl, or cagey - who most of the credit should be pointing to -amckern
Porting to Linux
What is Zoners position on a Linux port of his tool suite? Or a better question might be, how would Zoner and team feel about someone porting the tools? -SavannahLion
- I am open to any one that has the time porting ZHLT to linux, and thats the main reason why i provide the source code on updates --Amckern 07:59, 28 May 2006 (PDT)
Why is it different from the std tools?
What makes this stand out from the current default tools? --Holtt 19:39, 5 Jun 2006 (PDT)