Talk:Source Engine Beta: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Registry editing: re) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
: We have a lot of non-technical users that will be installing the Source Engine Beta. The potential for negative results when editing the registry is too high to suggest it as a standard method of installation. --[[User:JeffLane|JeffLane]] 10:48, 12 May 2006 (PDT) | : We have a lot of non-technical users that will be installing the Source Engine Beta. The potential for negative results when editing the registry is too high to suggest it as a standard method of installation. --[[User:JeffLane|JeffLane]] 10:48, 12 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
::May I ask why you protected this page? It seems a bit overkill if it's only about this registry modification thing. [[User:Jupix|Jupix]] 11:10, 12 May 2006 (PDT) | ::May I ask why you protected this page? It seems a bit overkill if it's only about this registry modification thing. [[User:Jupix|Jupix]] 11:10, 12 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
:::We don't want any other changes to this page at this time. The page will be unprotected at a later date. --[[User:JeffLane|JeffLane]] 12:19, 12 May 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 12:19, 12 May 2006
Discussion of the current Source Engine Beta.
Is it just me, or have load times decreased too? --TomEdwards 01:03, 12 May 2006 (PDT)
Also, no changes in the (HL2DM-)sourcecode --dutchmega 01:30, 12 May 2006 (PDT)
Registry editing
- Jeff Lane - I am just wondering why you dont want the reg key values on this page. I'm also sorry for the mass of edits, i kept hiting save, instead of preview. --Amckern
- We have a lot of non-technical users that will be installing the Source Engine Beta. The potential for negative results when editing the registry is too high to suggest it as a standard method of installation. --JeffLane 10:48, 12 May 2006 (PDT)