Welcome to Talk:VTFEdit Reloaded!
This is the start of the
To add a new message, click on "Add Topic/Reply" button below, and set the "Subject".
To add a Reply, do the same as above, but leave the "Subject" blank.
VTFEdit Reloaded discussion page.To add a new message, click on "Add Topic/Reply" button below, and set the "Subject".
To add a Reply, do the same as above, but leave the "Subject" blank.
Why were the edits canceled
Noug4at 20:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC+7:30)
I reverted the edits for the following reasons.
Firstly, this template usually specifies the developers. And you wrote there VtfEdit: Developers. VtfEdit Reloaded: Developers Which looks weird.
Secondly, the very fact that this fork does not mean that the original creators have anything to do with this? Why do we need to duplicate credits? If it is indicated that this is a fork and not a stand-alone application.
Thirdly, loans can be specified as a last resort, as I believe, outside the template. This article covers exactly the fork!
Here is an example of an article on Wikipedia, also a fork, and also not independent initially, but for some reason the authors of the Mozilla Foundation are not there? Help, add them.
Pale Moon, Waterfox, GNU IceCat.
When canceling your edits, I rely on the original Wikipedia (aesthetics as well).
Nevertheless, the original authors may be mentioned, but not in the same way as you did, literally breaking the template. No one belittles their merits...
Firstly, this template usually specifies the developers. And you wrote there VtfEdit: Developers. VtfEdit Reloaded: Developers Which looks weird.
Secondly, the very fact that this fork does not mean that the original creators have anything to do with this? Why do we need to duplicate credits? If it is indicated that this is a fork and not a stand-alone application.
Thirdly, loans can be specified as a last resort, as I believe, outside the template. This article covers exactly the fork!
Here is an example of an article on Wikipedia, also a fork, and also not independent initially, but for some reason the authors of the Mozilla Foundation are not there? Help, add them.
Pale Moon, Waterfox, GNU IceCat.When canceling your edits, I rely on the original Wikipedia (aesthetics as well).
Nevertheless, the original authors may be mentioned, but not in the same way as you did, literally breaking the template. No one belittles their merits...
JoshuaAshton 16:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
I see that you added an "originally created by" on the main page, that's fine, but there's no need to be an arse about it. You just reverted my change adding credits to everyone that worked on it. People deserve to be attributed for their work -- I was not even listed as an author on the page of *my own project* originally.
Noug4at 0:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC+7:30)
Sorry, no rudeness or nitpicking on my part... it may have sounded like that. Regarding the fact that you were not specified, it was my mistake. I just wanted the best...apologies
