Talk:List of entities: Difference between revisions
InvaderZim (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
InvaderZim (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I haven't checked this myself, but is ''aiscripted_schedule'' correct or was it supposed to be ''ai_scripted_schedule''? | I haven't checked this myself, but is ''aiscripted_schedule'' correct or was it supposed to be ''ai_scripted_schedule''? | ||
nevermind, i checked in hammer its right :) | |||
--[[User:InvaderZim|InvaderZim]] | --[[User:InvaderZim|InvaderZim]] |
Revision as of 10:59, 6 August 2005
Anyone else think that, if all of the entities are going to have an entry, that this should be changed to a category? I'm not gonna do it yet, but if the general opinion is that it should, then I'm sure someone will do it. --Charron 09:54, 29 Jun 2005 (PDT)
I've made a few changes that I think will help:
- Sorted entites into true categories based on effect, not name. There's only a few differences and it makes more sense.
- Renamed each category to a 'friendly' description.
- Added an index with headings to make jumping around easier.
--Tom Edwards 11:02, 28 Jun 2005 (PDT)
Thanks, I could have done it, but I wasn't sure how
--Fragrag
List seems to suit better than a category, especially considering how many entities there are
I suggest making templates for the inputs/outputs on the entities
--Megiddo
I think some standardised formatting for entities would be nice - I'm starting something here... -- Cargo Cult 14:38, 4 Jul 2005 (PDT)
I haven't checked this myself, but is aiscripted_schedule correct or was it supposed to be ai_scripted_schedule? nevermind, i checked in hammer its right :)