Ko/Bullet Penetration in Counter-Strike: Source

이 문서는 Counter-Strike: Source 에 있는 무기들의 총알의 관통의 깊이의 한계에 대한 정보를 다룹니다. 이 문서를 보고 가장 잘 학습한 사람은 총알무적인 벽을 만들기 위해 2-인치정도 벽을 두껍게 만드는 사람들입니다.

경고:이것들은 최근의 패치들로 인해 바뀔수도 있습니다... 현재 글로벌 오펜시브에서 들은 바로는 dust 2에 중앙 쌍문이 나무가 아니라 철로 바뀌었다는 소식이 있습니다.

기본적 결과

아래의 표들은 한 발을 쐇을때 벽에 얼마만큼 탄환이 깊게 박히는지 알려주는 표입니다. 블럭들은 6면이 모두 80x104xn 의 크기이며 아래주어진 텍스쳐로 색칠되었습니다.

무기	glass/prodwndwa	tools/toolsblockbullets tools/toolsnodraw
M3	1	1
XM1014	1	1
USP	15	6
Mac-10	15	6
UMP	15	6
TMP	20	8
Glock	21	9
Elites	21	9
MP5	21	9
P228	25	10
Five-Seven	30	12
P90	30	12
Deagle	30	12
Galil	35	14
Famas	35	14
M4-A1	35	14
SG 552	35	14
SG 550	35	14
M249	35	14
AK-47	39	16
Scout	39	16
Aug	39	16
G3SG1	39	16
AWP	45	18

The results of this are somewhat troubling: toolsblockbullets does not live up to its name. Even worse is the fact that nodraw is just as good at stopping bullets. Perhaps the material definitions reveal values that can be changed to affect the penetration distance.

SurfaceProperties.txt 와의 상관성

Upon further testing, it has become clear that the penetration depth depends on the gamematerial field of the surface property entry of the given material.

The table below was generated by adding a new entry to scripts/surfaceproperties_cs.txt:

"toughstuff"
{
	"density"	"1000000000"
	"elasticity"	"1000000000"
	"friction"	"1000000000"
	"dampening"	"1000000000"

	"stepleft"		"Glass.StepLeft"
	"stepright"		"Glass.StepRight"
	"scraperough"	"Glass.ScrapeRough"
	"scrapesmooth"	"Glass.ScrapeSmooth"
	"impacthard"	"Glass.ImpactHard"
	"impactsoft"	"Glass.ImpactSoft"
		
	"bulletimpact"	"Glass.BulletImpact"
	
	// "strain"		"Glass.Strain"
	"break"			"Glass.Break"

	"audioreflectivity" "0.66"
	"audiohardnessfactor" "1.0"

	"audioroughnessfactor" "0.0"
	"gamematerial"	"D"
}

During testing the density, elasticity, etc. were modified and shown to have no effect of penetration depth. The only property that affected the penetration depth was gamematerial.

To use this new surfaceproperty, materials/glass/bulletproof.vmt was created:

LightmappedGeneric
{
	"$basetexture"	"glass\prodwndwa"
	"$translucent" "1"
	"$nocull" "1"
	"$envmap" "env_cubemap"
	"$envmapmask" "glass\offwndwb_ref"
	"$surfaceprop" "toughstuff"
	"$crackmaterial" "glass\offwndwb_break"
}

Finally, several brushes ranging from a depth of 45 to 14 were created and each gamematerial type found in scripts/surfaceproperties.txt tested for penetration depth.

AWP inches	gamematerial	general description
18	C	Concrete
18	P	Computer
23	D	Dirt
23	V	Vent
30	T	Tile
45	-,B,F,G,H,I,L,M,O,S,T,X,Y	Everything Else: Flesh, Grates, Plastic, Metal, Liquids, Glass...
>45	W	Wood

Brush entities require the smaller of 24 inches and the value associated with the gamematerial. For example a brush of toolsblockbullets texture is used in a func_breakable. Since toolsblockbullets is type C, 18 is less than 24 so 18 is used. This was tested on a subset of gamematerial types and using func_breakable and func_wall entities.

Note surfaceprop "default" has gamematerial C. Thus bullets penetrate nodraw, blockbullets, etc. as if they were hitting concrete.

Layer Sandwiching for Bulletproofing

The above results are none too encouraging for people who want to create thin bullet-proof surfaces. However, the behavior of sandwiched entity brushes is a bit weird, and provides us a method.

To create truly bullet-proof glass, you need to use two 1 inch thick brushes with glass texture on all sides. Each brush must be in its own entity (tested with func_wall and func_breakable) and no empty space can separate the brushes. That's it. So simple it's so easy to miss. You can use any combination of textures on any of the faces and not destroy the bullet-proof property of this configuration. Here is a sample map.

Concluding Remarks

In general, sandwiching with space between brushes is no more efficient than a single large block. The property of entity brushes to reduce bullet penetration depth for most materials is a particularly useful result. Putting walls that should be resistant to bullets into func_wall entities would be a good trick to employ throughout many maps.

It is important to note that sandwiched brush entities are only stronger when the layers are in separate entities: {|}{|}{|}. Making a single entity of three sandwiched brushes {|||} is no more effective than a single brush entity of the same width.

For brushes with different materials on each face the penetration depth seems to match the value for the material through which the bullet entered the brush. The test example was a brush entity of depth 18 inches with one side glass and the other toolsblockbullets. AWP rounds penetrated the brush when shot from the glass side (entity penetration depth 24), but were stopped when shot from the toolsblockbullets side. This can be used actually for mimicking certain ultra-modern types of bulletproof glass that can be shot through from one side only, like bullet-proof windows of an armoured car.