File talk:Css.gif: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Where should this icon be used??) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm confused: Why is this logo not on the page about CounterStrike: Source? The HL2 logo is there instead. Checking the page history it has been going back and forth between {{css}} and {{hl2}} and {{hl2}} won, the rationale being that the {{hl1}} and {{hl2}} icons shows if the game is for Goldsource or Source respectively. ...but if this is the case, where do I use this icon if it has no field of use? --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 02:44, 12 Apr 2006 (PDT) | I'm confused: Why is this logo not on the page about CounterStrike: Source? The HL2 logo is there instead. Checking the page history it has been going back and forth between {{css}} and {{hl2}} and {{hl2}} won, the rationale being that the {{hl1}} and {{hl2}} icons shows if the game is for Goldsource or Source respectively. ...but if this is the case, where do I use this icon if it has no field of use? --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 02:44, 12 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
Also, I'd presonally prefer the [[Image:CSSicon.jpg]] logo (but imagine a better, png version, 'cause that particular image doesn't look too good in comparison with the one I made), ''if'' we can agree on a field of use. Could we use this logo for CSS-only entities? --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 11:18, 18 Apr 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:18, 18 April 2006
I'm confused: Why is this logo not on the page about CounterStrike: Source? The HL2 logo is there instead. Checking the page history it has been going back and forth between 
and 
and won, the rationale being that the 
and icons shows if the game is for Goldsource or Source respectively. ...but if this is the case, where do I use this icon if it has no field of use? --Andreasen 02:44, 12 Apr 2006 (PDT)
Also, I'd presonally prefer the 
logo (but imagine a better, png version, 'cause that particular image doesn't look too good in comparison with the one I made), if we can agree on a field of use. Could we use this logo for CSS-only entities? --Andreasen 11:18, 18 Apr 2006 (PDT)
