Talk:Applying Textures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TomEdwards (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
TomEdwards (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:There are several VDC members who can whip it into shape. --[[User:Mark WiseCarver|wisemx]] 07:36, 16 Feb 2006 (PST) | :There are several VDC members who can whip it into shape. --[[User:Mark WiseCarver|wisemx]] 07:36, 16 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
::I've made a few formatting changes. The big problem is that there are way too many images. We could easily consolidate them all into two or three if we really tried. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 08:17, 16 Feb 2006 (PST) | ::I've made a few formatting changes. The big problem is that there are way too many images. We could easily consolidate them all into two or three if we really tried. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 08:17, 16 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
:::I've [[Applying_Textures/v2draft|rewritten the whole thing]] to be more efficient. The images are still a sticking point though. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 09:31, 16 Feb 2006 (PST) |
Revision as of 10:31, 16 February 2006
Doesn't the article formatting look bad with the images on the right side and so much empty space in the body of the article? --wisemx 03:58, 16 Feb 2006 (PST)
- Well yes, but the alternative is having the pictures underneath, which makes it so one doesn't know which picture belongs to which text. In this way the pictures go with the text. Ideally one could instead make the pictures smaller by uploading closeups on what is refered to, because often the pictures are entire screens when only one small text box is being refered to. Edit: ...or you could remove some pictures too, but as this article is for newbies I'd be careful about removing pictures. Who knows, they might need them. --Andreasen 05:55, 16 Feb 2006 (PST)
- There are several VDC members who can whip it into shape. --wisemx 07:36, 16 Feb 2006 (PST)
- I've made a few formatting changes. The big problem is that there are way too many images. We could easily consolidate them all into two or three if we really tried. --TomEdwards 08:17, 16 Feb 2006 (PST)
- I've rewritten the whole thing to be more efficient. The images are still a sticking point though. --TomEdwards 09:31, 16 Feb 2006 (PST)
- I've made a few formatting changes. The big problem is that there are way too many images. We could easily consolidate them all into two or three if we really tried. --TomEdwards 08:17, 16 Feb 2006 (PST)