Talk:WiseHouse

Mark have given permission to move his tutorials and stuff from sdknuts.net

sdknuts will be closed 15 feb '08 and reopened later for other purposes

I have a copy of tuts and images locally and it will be added eventually If you have some spare time please grab a copy from sdknuts and give a hand :)

This is my first edit on wiki pages so please be gentle --Peter [AGHL] 16:34, 4 Feb 2008 (PST)

Sample files are missing from the article atm, I need to upload 'em to a hosting site and create an external link --Peter [AGHL] 16:34, 4 Feb 2008 (PST)

Tables ...

Hmm bit odd with this table editing thing Found a link which explains very well at http://en.wikipedia.org --Peter [AGHL] 04:29, 5 Feb 2008 (PST)

Experiment with it, but remember not to overuse tables to format images: in some cases it might be needed, but it's generally unnecessary since the images themselves can be formated using the extended image syntax. (I'm not referring specifically to your edits, since I haven't taken a good look at them; just making a general comment)

Also, most articles (especially tutorials such as these) should always have images for reference, but the number of images should not be excessive to the point that the article gets harder to read. If the page starts to look "clogged up" with images, consider suppressing a few of them. Another thing to note is: there's no problem if you scale-down an image so that it can fit neatly to the side of a paragraph (even if you can't tell out all the details in it) because the user can click the image to see it "full size", if the user is interested in doing so. It's more important to have a neatly organized page than being able to completely discern every little aspect of every picture on that page.

But as I said earlier, don't worry too much about it: if it doesn't turn out okay the first time it can be improved later! ;) --Etset 04:51, 5 Feb 2008 (PST)

Thanks a lot, looks a little better with scaled down images (thumbs) --Peter [AGHL] 06:32, 5 Feb 2008 (PST)

Broken links

Hmm how do I find broken links to sdknuts - eg wiseHouse? --Peter [AGHL] 14:13, 6 Feb 2008 (PST)

I guess only by searching for "sdknuts" here on the wiki search function. But it doesn't seem to find all of the articles with SDKnuts links... If necessary, we'll just have to fix those links when we bump into one! One-by-one ... --Etset 15:11, 6 Feb 2008 (PST)

Ok by searching in the talk pages I can find some --Peter [AGHL] 15:34, 6 Feb 2008 (PST)

By the way, I'm starting to notice that all tutorial titles are similar to "wiseXXXXX". I'm not trying to cheat Mark out of the spotlight here (his work should be credited, beyond a shadow of doubt), but I think these tutorials should have more distinct names, such as: Creating a house (instead of wiseHouse), Slumped zombie sequence (instead of wiseSeq), Using clips (instead of wiseClipping), and so on. I'm saying this because:

1. Normally when you search for something you find lots of articles, and it would be better if you could immediately know what the article is about by reading its title (wiseSeq doesn't really do much to tell what that article is about).
2. When you're searching for articles about a specific topic, you can go to Category pages. Categories list articles alphabetically, which would mean that not only would these articles would be stuffed under W, but also that people would probably not be very interested in looking into all of those articles to find out what they're about.
3. It goes against all of the other documentation that tries to have clear and distinct titles. That's why people don't choose "Mapping tutorial 1", "Mapping tutorial 2", (etc) as titles for articles, because it doesn't help people find what they're interested in, nor does it help in maintaining those articles at a later stage ("I know it was a wise article, but which one?", and so on)

I think that any way you look at it you find it's not beneficial to have article titles like that. But that's my opinion. And again, I completely think that all credit for the original tutorial should always be given to the author (personally, I would do so in the Talk page of the article, but again: that's my opinion). What do others think? --Etset 15:43, 6 Feb 2008 (PST)

I have been thinking just about the same ...

I'll keep the name of the images as is. Will it be easy to change the title/page name? or should this be done right from the start? Thanks a lot --Peter [AGHL] 23:21, 6 Feb 2008 (PST)