Template talk:Otherlang:en:jp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* I dunno. I thought it'd be nice to point out there is an alternative language for articles. | * I dunno. I thought it'd be nice to point out there is an alternative language for articles. | ||
:Yeah I agree -[[User:Pon|Pon]] 20:03, 16 Sep 2005 (PDT) | :Yeah I agree -[[User:Pon|Pon]] 20:03, 16 Sep 2005 (PDT) | ||
::Well it's not forced. We proposed to do so. We chose to use English titles for Japanese pages because: | |||
::*Japanese font might turn garbage on browsers with no Japanese font. | |||
::*[[:Category:Japanese]] serves as a portal with Japanese description about each article. So Japanese readers don't have to see English titles. | |||
::*Title translations are not final, moving page every time I or someone changes mind is simply annoying. Using current English title structure is less painful. | |||
::So far I only get one complaint from Japanese speakers that we should add add Japanese title under English title, and I'm doing that way now. And I think I'll go on using English titles. Thanks for caring, Maven, AndrewNeo, and Pon -- [[User:N-neko|N-neko]] |
Latest revision as of 22:01, 16 September 2005
Forcing a Japanese-language (or any other language) article to have an English title seems to defeat part of the purpose of having non-English articles—if someone is not comfortable with English, he/she might not be able to recognize the English title. Why not translate the titles as well? Maven 12:28, 16 Sep 2005 (PDT)
- I dunno. I thought it'd be nice to point out there is an alternative language for articles.
- Yeah I agree -Pon 20:03, 16 Sep 2005 (PDT)
- Well it's not forced. We proposed to do so. We chose to use English titles for Japanese pages because:
- Japanese font might turn garbage on browsers with no Japanese font.
- Category:Japanese serves as a portal with Japanese description about each article. So Japanese readers don't have to see English titles.
- Title translations are not final, moving page every time I or someone changes mind is simply annoying. Using current English title structure is less painful.
- So far I only get one complaint from Japanese speakers that we should add add Japanese title under English title, and I'm doing that way now. And I think I'll go on using English titles. Thanks for caring, Maven, AndrewNeo, and Pon -- N-neko
- Well it's not forced. We proposed to do so. We chose to use English titles for Japanese pages because: