Template talk:Ent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Another alternative is XML.) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think that if Jeff would know [http://www.w3schools.com/xml/default.asp XML], he could simply create a new tag in the CSS itself, called <nowiki><ent></nowiki>. That would leave the question, what is easier to write - "<nowiki>{{ent|path_track}}</nowiki>" or "<nowiki><ent path_track/></nowiki>"? --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 10:21, 23 Sep 2007 (PDT) | I think that if Jeff would know [http://www.w3schools.com/xml/default.asp XML], he could simply create a new tag in the CSS itself, called <nowiki><ent></nowiki>. That would leave the question, what is easier to write - "<nowiki>{{ent|path_track}}</nowiki>" or "<nowiki><ent path_track/></nowiki>"? --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 10:21, 23 Sep 2007 (PDT) | ||
:Not much of a difference really...—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' 12:06, 23 Sep 2007 (PDT) |
Revision as of 12:06, 23 September 2007
I think that if Jeff would know XML, he could simply create a new tag in the CSS itself, called <ent>. That would leave the question, what is easier to write - "{{ent|path_track}}" or "<ent path_track/>"? --Andreasen 10:21, 23 Sep 2007 (PDT)
- Not much of a difference really...—ts2do 12:06, 23 Sep 2007 (PDT)