Talk:Source Feature Requests

Why did you mark this for deletion, Ts2do?

'Cause there's a better place for bug reports already? —Cargo Cult _{(info, talk)} 10:55, 27 Nov 2005 (PST)

What? This has nothing to do with the SDK Beta. X^18

It has everything to do with the SDK beta - in that if you replicate the bug in the latest version of Hammer and report it as such, there's actually a chance it'll get fixed. :-/ —Cargo Cult _{(info, talk)} 13:10, 27 Nov 2005 (PST)

The page he deleted delt with a problem with the Source engine itself, not the SDK Beta, *or* Hammer. X^18

And coz you put it in two places—ts2do ^(Talk | @) 11:04, 27 Nov 2005 (PST)

They are two entirely seperate issues.

1) Hammer shows texture scale wrong - a Hammer issue, which is why I put it there.

2) basetexturetransforms don't work right - a Source issue, which is why I created this page.

They just use the same image.

I put a lot of work into that. Why did you come in and *delete* it without understanding it, and without as much as a word as to why? X^18

Btw Adam, I don't know if this is a sdkbeta report or not..—ts2do ^(Talk | @) 11:05, 27 Nov 2005 (PST)

Ok, to make what I'm saying clearer, I just uploaded an image for the Hammer problem with only the relevant info. X^18

Thank you sir...at first I just assumed you were doubleposting the same image—ts2do ^(Talk | @) 12:00, 27 Nov 2005 (PST)

In general, it's a very good idea to use {{deletebecause|reason}} instead of {{delete}}. —Maven ^(talk) 14:49, 27 Nov 2005 (PST)

Who asked for displacements on triangular faces? GL with that happenening before HL-3. From what I've determined from the coded approach to displacements maps they'd basically need to reinvent them in thier entirety just for the special case of 1 less side that really doesn't add any extra functionality. Plus I can't imagine how they'd do a 100 or so of the optimmizations to code I'm guessing they run for displacement maps. Angry Beaver 23:10, 23 Mar 2006 (PST)