Talk:Ladders: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
== Func_latterendpoint ==
== Func_latterendpoint ==


I realized you can use <code>Func_ladderendpoint</code> in the same way was <code>info_ladderdismount</code>
I realized you can use <code>Func_ladderendpoint</code> in the same way was <code>info_ladder_dismount</code>


~P-bait.
~P-bait.
:Please explain how. I've tested using func_ladderendpoints instead of info_ladder_dismounts and couldn't get them to work as dismounts at all. In my rework I'm about to post, func_ladderendpoints instead works as func_useableladder. I've heard func_ladderendpoints being used as means to get off at middle levels, but unless someone explain how this is done, I'm going to say that it's gossip.
- Andreasen
----
----


Line 16: Line 20:
"..."
"..."
Edit: Never mind, I've confirmed a lot about ladders and I'm working on reworking the whole ladders section as we speak.
Edit: Never mind, I've confirmed a lot about ladders and I'm working on reworking the whole ladders section as we speak.
- Andreasen

Revision as of 14:20, 27 January 2006

...Should we strike the CS:S ladder tutorial done by SixThree or is the note I added at the end of it good enough? As is I find it may be somewhat confusing. --wisemx 18:19, 5 Jul 2005 (PDT)

It seems fine to me. However, articles should not have signatures ("By SixThree") on them. This discourages other users from making changes to the article. If someone is really curious about the author(s) of an article, they can look in the article history. In the same vein, instead of your note at then end about toolsnodraw, you should either a) change the article directly, or b) if you don't have time to make all the changes or are not sure the change is correct, add a note in the Talk page so someone else can make the change. There should not be discussion in the actual page unless it is a stub (unreleased) article. --JeffLane 18:48, 5 Jul 2005 (PDT)

Noted Jeff, thanks  ;-) --wisemx 04:55, 6 Jul 2005 (PDT)

Func_latterendpoint

I realized you can use Func_ladderendpoint in the same way was info_ladder_dismount

~P-bait.

Please explain how. I've tested using func_ladderendpoints instead of info_ladder_dismounts and couldn't get them to work as dismounts at all. In my rework I'm about to post, func_ladderendpoints instead works as func_useableladder. I've heard func_ladderendpoints being used as means to get off at middle levels, but unless someone explain how this is done, I'm going to say that it's gossip.

- Andreasen


I posted this on the VERC forums, but as nobody replied to it, I'm about to do this myself: "..." Edit: Never mind, I've confirmed a lot about ladders and I'm working on reworking the whole ladders section as we speak. - Andreasen