Talk:Ladders: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Seeking confirmation about future changes.) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I posted this on the VERC forums, but as nobody replied to it, I'm about to do this myself: | I posted this on the VERC forums, but as nobody replied to it, I'm about to do this myself: | ||
"..." | |||
Edit: Never mind, I've confirmed a lot about ladders and I'm working on reworking the whole ladders section as we speak. | |||
Revision as of 08:43, 27 January 2006
...Should we strike the CS:S ladder tutorial done by SixThree or is the note I added at the end of it good enough? As is I find it may be somewhat confusing. --wisemx 18:19, 5 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- It seems fine to me. However, articles should not have signatures ("By SixThree") on them. This discourages other users from making changes to the article. If someone is really curious about the author(s) of an article, they can look in the article history. In the same vein, instead of your note at then end about toolsnodraw, you should either a) change the article directly, or b) if you don't have time to make all the changes or are not sure the change is correct, add a note in the Talk page so someone else can make the change. There should not be discussion in the actual page unless it is a stub (unreleased) article. --JeffLane 18:48, 5 Jul 2005 (PDT)
Noted Jeff, thanks ;-) --wisemx 04:55, 6 Jul 2005 (PDT)
Func_latterendpoint
I realized you can use Func_ladderendpoint
in the same way was info_ladderdismount
~P-bait.
I posted this on the VERC forums, but as nobody replied to it, I'm about to do this myself: "..." Edit: Never mind, I've confirmed a lot about ladders and I'm working on reworking the whole ladders section as we speak.