File talk:St view2.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (sig) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::<nowiki>*steps up*</nowiki> | ::<nowiki>*steps up*</nowiki> | ||
::Yes, but does your window looks like [http://www.btinternet.com/~varsity_uk/VDC/hammer_widescreen.jpg this]? }:-) --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 02:57, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ::Yes, but does your window looks like [http://www.btinternet.com/~varsity_uk/VDC/hammer_widescreen.jpg this]? }:-) --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 02:57, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
:::<nowiki>[accent]</nowiki>Thats not widescreen! [http://img318.imageshack.us/img318/2959/widewidescreen8wp.jpg This], is widescreen.<nowiki>[/accent]</nowiki> | :::''<nowiki>[aussie accent]</nowiki>'' Thats not widescreen! [http://img318.imageshack.us/img318/2959/widewidescreen8wp.jpg This], is widescreen.''<nowiki>[/aussie accent]</nowiki>'' --[[User:Zevensoft|Zevensoft]] 20:02, 30 Jul 2005 (PDT) |
Revision as of 20:02, 30 July 2005
Oh my word, how can you possibly use Hammer at that resolution? :o --TomEdwards 23:55, 28 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- It's windowed and resized. Is the image too fuzzy? -- Sodabus 00:05, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- I think I ought to be taking screenshots on my own machine. 2560x960 good enough? ;-] --Cargo Cult 01:50, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- *steps up*
- Yes, but does your window looks like this? }:-) --TomEdwards 02:57, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)