Talk:Procedural Materials: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ZeroDegrez (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
: What we need is an animated cube of roiling, rain-drenched thunderclouds, complete with lightning... --[[User:Cargo Cult|Cargo Cult]] 08:21, 25 Jul 2005 (PDT) | : What we need is an animated cube of roiling, rain-drenched thunderclouds, complete with lightning... --[[User:Cargo Cult|Cargo Cult]] 08:21, 25 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
:: Now you're talking. Someone get to work on a procedural cloud image generator. Not it! --[[User:ZeroDegrez|ZeroDegrez]] 4:40, 25 Jul 2005 (EST) | :: Now you're talking. Someone get to work on a procedural cloud image generator. Not it! --[[User:ZeroDegrez|ZeroDegrez]] 4:40, 25 Jul 2005 (EST) | ||
:::If I recall correctly, www.shader.org had some pretty nifty cloud shaders... It shouldn't be that hard to port one to C++... And a couple might even be in HLSL :D | |||
Revision as of 23:23, 25 July 2005
Dude. Woah. --TomEdwards 13:35, 22 Jul 2005 (PDT)
You can use these for skyboxes, yeah? --Pon
I don't think so. Sky-textures are special materials --King2500 06:09, 23 Jul 2005 (PDT)
Hmm, that might be worth trying. --ZeroDegrez 06:28, 23 Jul 2005 (EST)
Yes, they can be used as skybox textures ;) It's pretty cool watching Red vs. Blue in skybox, lol --ZeroDegrez 10:40, 25 Jul 2005 (EST)
- What we need is an animated cube of roiling, rain-drenched thunderclouds, complete with lightning... --Cargo Cult 08:21, 25 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- Now you're talking. Someone get to work on a procedural cloud image generator. Not it! --ZeroDegrez 4:40, 25 Jul 2005 (EST)
- If I recall correctly, www.shader.org had some pretty nifty cloud shaders... It shouldn't be that hard to port one to C++... And a couple might even be in HLSL :D
- Now you're talking. Someone get to work on a procedural cloud image generator. Not it! --ZeroDegrez 4:40, 25 Jul 2005 (EST)