Talk:Door creation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CrabbyData (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::You can disagree with me on this, but I seriously think this tut needs a cleaning up and some pictures/images to make it more clear. This is like reading text on toiletpaper, that just goes on, and on, and on, and on... etc. --[[User:CrabbyData|CrabbyData]] 11:36, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT) | :::You can disagree with me on this, but I seriously think this tut needs a cleaning up and some pictures/images to make it more clear. This is like reading text on toiletpaper, that just goes on, and on, and on, and on... etc. --[[User:CrabbyData|CrabbyData]] 11:36, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT) | ||
::::Sure, I agree with you, this tutorial needs "cleaning up". But, as I've discussed with Jupix elsewhere before, I stand by the principle that if you are going to take the time to put the cleanup tag on an article, you should take the time to also provide pointers to the article's author, ''especially'' when they ask for those pointers. At the very least, point him in the direction of [[:Category:Level Design Tutorials|the existing tutorials]], so he can compare his to others and figure it out for himself. --[[User:Giles|Giles]] 11:43, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:43, 23 June 2006
It's nice seeing you improve you're language-usage, but although it's pretty good, it's still not what the wiki-standards are looking for. And you're using way to much long phrases and you're not making yourself clear by that. Also, you should consider talking about the properties of certain entities... --CrabbyData 10:47, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- okay. umm... could you help me please? Game4ever 10:52, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- That's something for Ts2do, since he's God himself @ this wiki :P He also altered my tut, but that was a little more advanced and cleaner than this one, and also had a little more complicated subject--CrabbyData 10:56, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- I was always taught at school to write instructions at someone, not without a target like in third person. And its hard to break that habit. But thats still no excuse. Game4ever 11:00, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- You are right and CrabbyData is wrong here. The "point of view" style is about not saying "I have ...", "I am ...", "I will ...". There's nothing wrong with saying "you are ...", "you can ...", etc. --Giles 11:22, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- You can disagree with me on this, but I seriously think this tut needs a cleaning up and some pictures/images to make it more clear. This is like reading text on toiletpaper, that just goes on, and on, and on, and on... etc. --CrabbyData 11:36, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- Sure, I agree with you, this tutorial needs "cleaning up". But, as I've discussed with Jupix elsewhere before, I stand by the principle that if you are going to take the time to put the cleanup tag on an article, you should take the time to also provide pointers to the article's author, especially when they ask for those pointers. At the very least, point him in the direction of the existing tutorials, so he can compare his to others and figure it out for himself. --Giles 11:43, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)