File:JPEG Quality Comparison.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Note:This comparison is saved as a JPEG so that it will fit on the VDC. This means all the images have been recompressed, but the comparison was saved at Photoshop's maximum quality and the compression is imperceptible.
(Delete!) |
SirYodaJedi (talk | contribs) m (Add autolang with doucheland description) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A quality comparison of three JPEG screenshots, taking at Quality 1, Quality 50, and Quality 100. Note the visual difference between 50 and 100 are only slightly noticable, but the filesize is roughly 10 times larger. | {{autolang | ||
| A quality comparison of three JPEG screenshots, taking at Quality 1, Quality 50, and Quality 100. Note the visual difference between 50 and 100 are only slightly noticable, but the filesize is roughly 10 times larger. | |||
|de = Ein Vergleich der JPEG-Qualität bei 1, 50 und 100. Beachte: der visuelle Unterschied zwischen 50 und 100 ist fast nicht zu bemerken, aber die Dateigröße ist rund 10x so groß | |||
}} | |||
{{note|This comparison is saved as a JPEG so that it will fit on the VDC. This means all the images have been recompressed, but the comparison was saved at Photoshop's maximum quality and the compression is imperceptible.}} | {{note|This comparison is saved as a JPEG so that it will fit on the VDC. This means all the images have been recompressed, but the comparison was saved at Photoshop's maximum quality and the compression is imperceptible.}} | ||
{{delete|A horrible showcase of JPEG}} | {{delete|A horrible showcase of JPEG}} | ||
Revision as of 03:44, 2 June 2023
This template (and its redirect) is 
Deprecated. Its use is not recommended and its functionality may be compromised.
You can help our editors by replacing or deleting this template on the Pages that use this template. Once no more pages use this template, it should be Marked for deletion.
Additional notes:
Use #switch parser function instead. Example
Deprecated. Its use is not recommended and its functionality may be compromised. You can help our editors by replacing or deleting this template on the Pages that use this template. Once no more pages use this template, it should be Marked for deletion.
Additional notes:
Use #switch parser function instead. Example
{{#switch: {{language}}
| #default = English
| ja = 日本語
| zh-tw = 中文（台灣）
}} Note:This comparison is saved as a JPEG so that it will fit on the VDC. This means all the images have been recompressed, but the comparison was saved at Photoshop's maximum quality and the compression is imperceptible.This file has been marked as a candidate for speedy deletion for the following reason:
Administrators / Moderators - Remember to check if anything links here and the page history before deleting.
A horrible showcase of JPEG
If you object to this decision, then please discuss why here (If you make a discussion section also create this redirect page). If this page doesn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion, then please remove this notice, but do not remove it from pages that you have created yourself
Administrators / Moderators - Remember to check if anything links here and the page history before deleting.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 01:11, 27 December 2010 |  | 1,920 × 3,240 (1.99 MB) | Thelonesoldier (talk | contribs) | A quality comparison of three JPEG screenshots, taking at Quality 1, Quality 50, and Quality 100. Note the visual difference between 50 and 100 are only slightly noticable, but the filesize is roughly 10 times larger. {{note|This comparison is saved as a |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.
