File talk:St view2.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cargo Cult (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cargo Cult (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I think I ought to be taking screenshots on my own machine. 2560x960 good enough? ;-] --[[User:Cargo Cult|Cargo Cult]] 01:50, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT) | : I think I ought to be taking screenshots on my own machine. 2560x960 good enough? ;-] --[[User:Cargo Cult|Cargo Cult]] 01:50, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
::<nowiki>*steps up*</nowiki> | |||
::Yes, but does your window looks like [http://www.btinternet.com/~varsity_uk/VDC/hammer_widescreen.jpg this]? }:-) --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 02:57, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT) | |||
:::''<nowiki>[aussie accent]</nowiki>'' Thats not widescreen! [http://img318.imageshack.us/img318/2959/widewidescreen8wp.jpg This], is widescreen.''<nowiki>[/aussie accent]</nowiki>'' --[[User:Zevensoft|Zevensoft]] 20:02, 30 Jul 2005 (PDT) | |||
:: I tried to get a 2560x960-sized Hammer, but the 3D preview didn't work when that wide for some reason. I got a big black band down most of the right-hand monitor. Bah... --[[User:Cargo Cult|Cargo Cult]] 03:56, 31 Jul 2005 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:56, 31 July 2005
Oh my word, how can you possibly use Hammer at that resolution? :o --TomEdwards 23:55, 28 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- It's windowed and resized. Is the image too fuzzy? -- Sodabus 00:05, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- I think I ought to be taking screenshots on my own machine. 2560x960 good enough? ;-] --Cargo Cult 01:50, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- *steps up*
- Yes, but does your window looks like this? }:-) --TomEdwards 02:57, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- I tried to get a 2560x960-sized Hammer, but the 3D preview didn't work when that wide for some reason. I got a big black band down most of the right-hand monitor. Bah... --Cargo Cult 03:56, 31 Jul 2005 (PDT)
