Valve Developer Community talk:Necessary Features: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(automatically repair discussion (indenting will need to be done manually))
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


== New Skin ==
== New Skin ==
For god's sake please don't use this new wiki's "one-narrow-column" layout, it '''will ruin''' layout of all pages that have large images and screenshots.
Pages shouldn't be embedding pictures larger than 854px wide, except as backgrounds. If you see any such examples, add {{code|{{!}}854px}} (or a lower size) to their embed tag (ex: {{code|<nowiki>[[File:Imagename.png|854px]]</nowiki>}}). -- [[User:SirYodaJedi]] 0:28, 6 Jun 2023


''-If it ain't broken, don't fix it.''
Give an example of such pages. --[[Raccoon]] ([[User talk:Raccoon|talk]]) 19:09, 26 Apr 2023
{{Message
| user = SirYodaJedi
| time = 0:28, 6 Jun 2023
| Pages shouldn't be embedding pictures larger than 854px wide, except as backgrounds. If you see any such examples, add {{code|{{! [[User:Raccoon|Raccoon]] ([[User talk:(Raccoon)|talk]]) 19:09, 26 Apr 2023854px}} (or a lower size) to their embed tag (ex: {{code|<nowiki>[[File:Imagename.png|854px]]</nowiki>}}).
}}
}}


Give an example of such pages.
The new skin takes on the current wiki appearance with a screen width of 1366 pixels. The article block in the new skin has a maximum width of 1206 pixels. For comparison, in Wikipedia, this block has a width of 960 pixels. --[[THE OWL]] ([[User talk:THE OWL|talk]]) 7:47, 29 Apr 2023
 
The new skin takes on the current wiki appearance with a screen width of 1366 pixels. The article block in the new skin has a maximum width of 1206 pixels. For comparison, in Wikipedia, this block has a width of 960 pixels. [[User:THE OWL|THE OWL]] ([[User talk:(THE OWL)|talk]]) 7:47, 29 Apr 2023


I frequently use a 4:3 browser viewport that reports a width 1024 pixels (at 2.0x PPI scale or so; it's a tablet). The wiki already is a narrow column, but the page content ''would'' get formatted differently based on what you say. The current skin is designed for ancient 1024x768 screens, so it works great; please don't make it any smaller.
I frequently use a 4:3 browser viewport that reports a width 1024 pixels (at 2.0x PPI scale or so; it's a tablet). The wiki already is a narrow column, but the page content ''would'' get formatted differently based on what you say. The current skin is designed for ancient 1024x768 screens, so it works great; please don't make it any smaller.


Pages such as [[Valve texture format]], and most 1280px or higher File: pages are already too wide on my screen, for various reasons. Width should absolutely be standardized, but it should keep the least common denominators in mind. [[User:SirYodaJedi|SirYodaJedi]] ([[User talk:(SirYodaJedi)|talk]]) 0:20, 6 Jun 2023
Pages such as [[Valve texture format]], and most 1280px or higher File: pages are already too wide on my screen, for various reasons. Width should absolutely be standardized, but it should keep the least common denominators in mind. --[[SirYodaJedi]] ([[User talk:SirYodaJedi|talk]]) 0:20, 6 Jun 2023


== New Skin (Mockup) ==
== New Skin (Mockup) ==
Line 25: Line 17:
[[File:mw-vdc-mockup.png|854px|right]]
[[File:mw-vdc-mockup.png|854px|right]]


What do you all think? I know the mockup may not look the best, but I believe the structural layout of it is very solid. [[User:Mailmanmicky|Mailmanmicky]] ([[User talk:(Mailmanmicky)|talk]]) 19:17, 18 May 2023
What do you all think? I know the mockup may not look the best, but I believe the structural layout of it is very solid. --[[Mailmanmicky]] ([[User talk:Mailmanmicky|talk]]) 19:17, 18 May 2023


I like it; it's basically what [https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Home PCGamingWiki does], and it doesn't do any unnecessary moving of stuff around, unlike what Wikia did when removing Monobook. [[User:SirYodaJedi|SirYodaJedi]] ([[User talk:(SirYodaJedi)|talk]]) 0:34, 25 May 2023
I like it; it's basically what [https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Home PCGamingWiki does], and it doesn't do any unnecessary moving of stuff around, unlike what Wikia did when removing Monobook. --[[SirYodaJedi]] ([[User talk:SirYodaJedi|talk]]) 0:34, 25 May 2023

Latest revision as of 23:25, 17 June 2024

Icon-message-48px.png
This is the discussion page of Valve Developer Community:Necessary Features. To add a comment, use the Edit button near the headline of the appropriate section. To create a new section, you can use the Add topic button at the top of this page.
Comments on talk pages should be signed with "~~~~", which will be converted into your signature and a timestamp.

New Skin

Pages shouldn't be embedding pictures larger than 854px wide, except as backgrounds. If you see any such examples, add |854px (or a lower size) to their embed tag (ex: [[File:Imagename.png|854px]]). -- User:SirYodaJedi 0:28, 6 Jun 2023

Give an example of such pages. --Raccoon (talk) 19:09, 26 Apr 2023

The new skin takes on the current wiki appearance with a screen width of 1366 pixels. The article block in the new skin has a maximum width of 1206 pixels. For comparison, in Wikipedia, this block has a width of 960 pixels. --THE OWL (talk) 7:47, 29 Apr 2023

I frequently use a 4:3 browser viewport that reports a width 1024 pixels (at 2.0x PPI scale or so; it's a tablet). The wiki already is a narrow column, but the page content would get formatted differently based on what you say. The current skin is designed for ancient 1024x768 screens, so it works great; please don't make it any smaller.

Pages such as Valve texture format, and most 1280px or higher File: pages are already too wide on my screen, for various reasons. Width should absolutely be standardized, but it should keep the least common denominators in mind. --SirYodaJedi (talk) 0:20, 6 Jun 2023

New Skin (Mockup)

Did my own mockup of what I think a new skin should look like:

Mw-vdc-mockup.png

What do you all think? I know the mockup may not look the best, but I believe the structural layout of it is very solid. --Mailmanmicky (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2023

I like it; it's basically what PCGamingWiki does, and it doesn't do any unnecessary moving of stuff around, unlike what Wikia did when removing Monobook. --SirYodaJedi (talk) 0:34, 25 May 2023