Talk:Postal III

This is the discussion page of Postal III. To add a comment, use the Edit button near the headline of the appropriate section. To create a new section, you can use the Add topic button at the top of this page.
Comments on talk pages should be signed with "~~~~", which will be converted into your signature and a timestamp.

Physx cloth models

The models contained in models/cloth CAN have physx physics applied(this is not "dubious"). They must be placed as p3_prop_cloth and not p3_prop_physx. I have uploaded a video demonstrating this here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIIhAkWdq_I and if you'd like I can provide the bsp and vmf of this map (obtained from the 2009 xbox build). This particular video was recorded on a pre-Zoom build of the game(ActControl DRM) with physx enabled. Disabling Physx causes odd results where the cloth models vibrate but do not interact with the Postal Dude as they do in the previous example. An example of the cloth models without physx being enabled can be seen here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh3FzrHASf0 and shows that physx is used for these to some extent since they act differently with and without Physx enabled. ABRAoriginal

Further notes on this: Several files within the Cloth folder contain "APEX" in their names with APEX referring to the Nvidia Physx tech name https://gameworksdocs.nvidia.com/APEX/1.4/docs/APEX_Clothing/Index.html and within this folder in the 2010 Xbox build of the game are 2 .aca files(drapes_01_apex.aca and advertizing_apex.aca) which are Nvidia APEX cloth asset files as mentioned in the documentation here https://gameworksdocs.nvidia.com/APEX/1.4/docs/APEX_Clothing/ClothingTool.html. Also several of them literally have Physx in the name within the test folder such as advertizing_physx.mdl so I again say that attributing these models to Physx tests is not "dubious" ABRAoriginal (talk) 00:14, 10 August 2024 (PDT)ABRAoriginal