User talk:Neverender: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Neverender (talk | contribs) |
(→Quality compare .jpg's: changed links which removed image description) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Why did you post they would be linked from [[Skybox (2D) with Terragen and Skypaint - Advanced]] when they are not? --[[User:Vaarscha|Vaarscha]] 12:41, 27 Apr 2006 (PDT) | Why did you post they would be linked from [[Skybox (2D) with Terragen and Skypaint - Advanced]] when they are not? --[[User:Vaarscha|Vaarscha]] 12:41, 27 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
:They ARE linked, but it's done using plain text (see: "compare this Middle and this High"), which apparently isn't good enough for MediaWiki. Is there any way to hint that the images are used without changing the way they're employed on the pages? --[[User:Neverender|Neverender]] 19:10, 27 Apr 2006 (PDT) | :They ARE linked, but it's done using plain text (see: "compare this Middle and this High"), which apparently isn't good enough for MediaWiki. Is there any way to hint that the images are used without changing the way they're employed on the pages? --[[User:Neverender|Neverender]] 19:10, 27 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
::Well, the description was linked, not the image itself. I have changed it so that it directly links to the image... which removes the description :/ I don't know another way to do that, however in this case there's no proper description anyway, so I guess it's acceptable. --[[User:Vaarscha|Vaarscha]] 02:46, 28 Apr 2006 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:46, 28 April 2006
Quality compare .jpg's
Why did you post they would be linked from Skybox (2D) with Terragen and Skypaint - Advanced when they are not? --Vaarscha 12:41, 27 Apr 2006 (PDT)
- They ARE linked, but it's done using plain text (see: "compare this Middle and this High"), which apparently isn't good enough for MediaWiki. Is there any way to hint that the images are used without changing the way they're employed on the pages? --Neverender 19:10, 27 Apr 2006 (PDT)
- Well, the description was linked, not the image itself. I have changed it so that it directly links to the image... which removes the description :/ I don't know another way to do that, however in this case there's no proper description anyway, so I guess it's acceptable. --Vaarscha 02:46, 28 Apr 2006 (PDT)