Talk:$model (QC): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TomEdwards (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
3. Or something else entirely ? --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 17:56, 2 May 2008 (PDT) | 3. Or something else entirely ? --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 17:56, 2 May 2008 (PDT) | ||
:It's a limitation/bugs of mdldecompiler. They're meant to be $bodygroups and the "unknownmodelname" SMDs show up for every NPC/player model I've tried. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 05:09, 3 May 2008 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:09, 3 May 2008
multiple $models
Using MdlDecompiler to look at a DOD player model QC, I found this:
$modelname "player\german_support.mdl" $model "body" "german_support_reference.smd" $model "helmet" "german_helmet_reference.smd" $model "helmet" "UnknownModelName.smd" // ... $attachment "2" "ValveBiped.Bip01_Head1" -0.00 0.00 0.00 rotate -0.00 0.00 0.00 $attachment "head" "ValveBiped.Bip01_Head1" -0.00 0.00 0.00 rotate -0.00 0.00 0.00
Looking through the SMDs, the "german_helmet_reference.smd" mesh is enveloped to the "ValveBiped.Bip01_Head1" bone and "UnknownModelName.smd" contains no triangles whatsoever. So, is this :
1. MdlDecompiler not translating the binaries into a valid QC (I haven't tested it) ?
2. An alternative to $bodygroup for combining meshes; enveloping a second mesh to the main skeleton as opposed to using the head $attachment and a sub-model ?
3. Or something else entirely ? --Beeswax 17:56, 2 May 2008 (PDT)
- It's a limitation/bugs of mdldecompiler. They're meant to be $bodygroups and the "unknownmodelname" SMDs show up for every NPC/player model I've tried. --TomEdwards 05:09, 3 May 2008 (PDT)