Talk:Source Engine Features: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


This page is nearly a duplicate for http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Source. Am on my way to work at the moment so.. needs to be compared to /Source and duplicate parts merged and/or referenced. :— [[user:BJ|BJ]] 12 May 2006 (EDT)
This page is nearly a duplicate for http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Source. Am on my way to work at the moment so.. needs to be compared to /Source and duplicate parts merged and/or referenced. :— [[user:BJ|BJ]] 12 May 2006 (EDT)
:The reason this is: [[Source]] is open for editing and [[{{PAGENAME}}|this]] isn't—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' 06:57, 12 May 2006 (PDT)

Revision as of 06:57, 12 May 2006

I've always wanted to know: why do you guys insist on using such horribly outdated images for all your engine PR? They don't reflect the final quality of either HL2 OR Source (The Antlion Guard one is the only exception). --TomEdwards 08:33, 1 Jul 2005 (PDT)

Theres at least 5 artistic errors on these images. Actually the engine looks much better in-game. More realistic, with better look and feel. Tom, you read my mind! --Tei

I've noticed that it says all code was written in VC++ 6, but the SDK code is in VC++ 2003. Not sure if they're actually different or what, just wanted to point it out. --AndrewNeo 17:09, 6 Jul 2005 (PDT)

Update

This page needs the following:—ts2do 21:06, 19 Mar 2006 (PST)

{{otherlang:en}}{{otherlang:en:jp|Source Engine Features:jp}}

Duplicate Page

This page is nearly a duplicate for http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Source. Am on my way to work at the moment so.. needs to be compared to /Source and duplicate parts merged and/or referenced. :— BJ 12 May 2006 (EDT)

The reason this is: Source is open for editing and this isn't—ts2do 06:57, 12 May 2006 (PDT)