Template talk:Ent not in fgd: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
SirYodaJedi (talk | contribs) (→Icon) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Ask and you shall receive. Already swapped it for you. --[[User:MrFunreal|MrFunreal]] ([[User talk:MrFunreal|talk]]) 03:11, 16 May 2025 (PDT) | :Ask and you shall receive. Already swapped it for you. --[[User:MrFunreal|MrFunreal]] ([[User talk:MrFunreal|talk]]) 03:11, 16 May 2025 (PDT) | ||
::Looks nice. Now I am little worried though it looks like it signifies that the entity shouldn't be put in hammer at all. Maybe would be nice to have the crossed out icon for entities that shouldn't be placed in a map at all like [[player]], [[terror_gamerules]] etc. and have another icon for an entity that is still usable but just not in fgd. Or maybe I am just overthinking --[[User:Nescius|Nescius]] ([[User talk:Nescius|talk]]) 10:12, 18 May 2025 (PDT) | ::Looks nice. Now I am little worried though it looks like it signifies that the entity shouldn't be put in hammer at all. Maybe would be nice to have the crossed out icon for entities that shouldn't be placed in a map at all like [[player]], [[terror_gamerules]] etc. and have another icon for an entity that is still usable but just not in fgd. Or maybe I am just overthinking --[[User:Nescius|Nescius]] ([[User talk:Nescius|talk]]) 10:12, 18 May 2025 (PDT) | ||
:::I think it's fine. If it were a red or yellow background, I'd interpret as a don't place, but with the current background, I just interpret it as "not in hammer".<br/>— [[User:SirYodaJedi|SirYodaJedi]] ([[User_talk:SirYodaJedi|talk]]) 11:07, 18 May 2025 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:07, 18 May 2025
Icon
This could probably use some crossed hammer icon (if someone wants to make one) to better represent what not being in FGD means ? --Nescius (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2025 (PDT)
- Ask and you shall receive. Already swapped it for you. --MrFunreal (talk) 03:11, 16 May 2025 (PDT)
- Looks nice. Now I am little worried though it looks like it signifies that the entity shouldn't be put in hammer at all. Maybe would be nice to have the crossed out icon for entities that shouldn't be placed in a map at all like player, terror_gamerules etc. and have another icon for an entity that is still usable but just not in fgd. Or maybe I am just overthinking --Nescius (talk) 10:12, 18 May 2025 (PDT)
- I think it's fine. If it were a red or yellow background, I'd interpret as a don't place, but with the current background, I just interpret it as "not in hammer".
— SirYodaJedi (talk) 11:07, 18 May 2025 (PDT)
- I think it's fine. If it were a red or yellow background, I'd interpret as a don't place, but with the current background, I just interpret it as "not in hammer".
- Looks nice. Now I am little worried though it looks like it signifies that the entity shouldn't be put in hammer at all. Maybe would be nice to have the crossed out icon for entities that shouldn't be placed in a map at all like player, terror_gamerules etc. and have another icon for an entity that is still usable but just not in fgd. Or maybe I am just overthinking --Nescius (talk) 10:12, 18 May 2025 (PDT)