Talk:CScriptParser: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Weapon scripts === | === Weapon scripts === | ||
Etc.. I wish Valve would have just used XML. Though, shouldn't it be possible to replace all instances of this kind of stuff (if you were really up to it?) I think you could just replace all instances of the current parser in the code with another that parses XML of it instead. Even the tools. (Unfortunately we'd have to recompile Hammer to save in XML format) --[[User:AndrewNeo|AndrewNeo]] 19:22, 6 Aug 2006 (PDT) | Etc.. I wish Valve would have just used XML. Though, shouldn't it be possible to replace all instances of this kind of stuff (if you were really up to it?) I think you could just replace all instances of the current parser in the code with another that parses XML of it instead. Even the tools. (Unfortunately we'd have to recompile Hammer to save in XML format) --[[User:AndrewNeo|AndrewNeo]] 19:22, 6 Aug 2006 (PDT) | ||
: I agree, I have been considering using TinyXML for my mod, but it would be a lot of rewriting... Also, IIRC some of the keyvalues files we use are loaded by the engine... Although, adding XML support to this class or variations wouldn't take long and provide the option for both. --[[User:Scottloyd|Scottloyd]] | |||
Revision as of 00:27, 7 August 2006
Thanks, this is a very usefull "lib" to get that working.
--Dolphin's Eye
Weapon scripts
Etc.. I wish Valve would have just used XML. Though, shouldn't it be possible to replace all instances of this kind of stuff (if you were really up to it?) I think you could just replace all instances of the current parser in the code with another that parses XML of it instead. Even the tools. (Unfortunately we'd have to recompile Hammer to save in XML format) --AndrewNeo 19:22, 6 Aug 2006 (PDT)
- I agree, I have been considering using TinyXML for my mod, but it would be a lot of rewriting... Also, IIRC some of the keyvalues files we use are loaded by the engine... Although, adding XML support to this class or variations wouldn't take long and provide the option for both. --Scottloyd