Talk:Source in Academic Work: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Should this really have been changed from academic work to school work? Sure, both entries so far have been school work, but that isn't the sole potential now is it? I was going to enter my honours project on this page as it is based on Source, but it isn't school work so it now seems incorrect to do so. --[[User:ReNo|ReNo]] 11:11, 6 May 2006 (PDT) | Should this really have been changed from academic work to school work? Sure, both entries so far have been school work, but that isn't the sole potential now is it? I was going to enter my honours project on this page as it is based on Source, but it isn't school work so it now seems incorrect to do so. --[[User:ReNo|ReNo]] 11:11, 6 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
:Go right ahead. --[[User:Alph Tech STUART|Alph Tech STUART]] 11:24, 6 May 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:24, 6 May 2006
I wish my english teacher let us do somthing like that!!!—Cubedude 19:14, 3 Mar 2006 (PST)
- The project wasn't explicity to use Source...it was to present info, I asked and he was fine with it...so I did it =p—ts2do 19:19, 3 Mar 2006 (PST)
- That was a great idea. I cant wait to try it out. Cubedude 19:21, 3 Mar 2006 (PST)
- What a stupid idea. "HAY LET'S USE SOURCE TO DISPLAY TEXT" Seriously. This just goes to show that ts2do is obsessed with making everything with Source.
Should this really have been changed from academic work to school work? Sure, both entries so far have been school work, but that isn't the sole potential now is it? I was going to enter my honours project on this page as it is based on Source, but it isn't school work so it now seems incorrect to do so. --ReNo 11:11, 6 May 2006 (PDT)
- Go right ahead. --Alph Tech STUART 11:24, 6 May 2006 (PDT)