Template talk:Pov: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (just do it! :)) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:'''Hell yes!''' --[[User:Vaarscha|Vaarscha]] 10:35, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT) | :'''Hell yes!''' --[[User:Vaarscha|Vaarscha]] 10:35, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
:A better idea would be perhaps to create <nowiki>{{POV}}</nowiki> and gradually phase this one out. I don't really see the benefit of clogging up Recent Changes with 25 changes to the articles currently using it, and it doesn't seem like a worthwhile use of anyone's time. But hey, if you really want to do it, I wouldn't stop you. :) [[User:Giles|Giles]] 11:00, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT) | :A better idea would be perhaps to create <nowiki>{{POV}}</nowiki> and gradually phase this one out. I don't really see the benefit of clogging up Recent Changes with 25 changes to the articles currently using it, and it doesn't seem like a worthwhile use of anyone's time. But hey, if you really want to do it, I wouldn't stop you. :) [[User:Giles|Giles]] 11:00, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
::Is it possible for a Template to be a redirect? We should do either way, right now it is as counter-intuitive as it gets... --[[User:Vaarscha|Vaarscha]] 02:29, 1 May 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:29, 1 May 2006
Should the name of this template be changed to simply "POV"? --Andreasen 10:28, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT)
- Hell yes! --Vaarscha 10:35, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT)
- A better idea would be perhaps to create {{POV}} and gradually phase this one out. I don't really see the benefit of clogging up Recent Changes with 25 changes to the articles currently using it, and it doesn't seem like a worthwhile use of anyone's time. But hey, if you really want to do it, I wouldn't stop you. :) Giles 11:00, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT)
- Is it possible for a Template to be a redirect? We should do either way, right now it is as counter-intuitive as it gets... --Vaarscha 02:29, 1 May 2006 (PDT)