Talk:Theoretical Disaster: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Goldsource: new section) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I havent really done much, I've made a progress bar, on the side. | I havent really done much, I've made a progress bar, on the side. | ||
[[File:ProgressBar.jpg]] | [[File:ProgressBar.jpg]] | ||
== Goldsource == | |||
Is their a particular reason you are using GoldSource instead of Source? --[[User:Omnicoder|Omnicoder]] 00:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:33, 31 October 2010
How much actual work do you have done for this mod? Or is this all theoretical? Thelonesoldier 12:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Legit lol. --Msleeper 22:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Don't expect a goldsrc mod to do very well in an age where even Source is becoming outdated. --Omnicoder 16:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Becoming? Anyway, I believe there is a general consensus to delete mods that have no actual work completed? It's very, very easy to come up with an idea and say "I'm going to make a mod now I just need a team to do all the work for me", but most mods don't even get started beyond that point. Thelonesoldier 22:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Owner's Comment
I havent really done much, I've made a progress bar, on the side. File:ProgressBar.jpg
Goldsource
Is their a particular reason you are using GoldSource instead of Source? --Omnicoder 00:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC)