Talk:Theoretical Disaster: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Don't expect a goldsrc mod to do very well in an age where even Source is becoming outdated. --[[User:Omnicoder|Omnicoder]] 16:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | Don't expect a goldsrc mod to do very well in an age where even Source is becoming outdated. --[[User:Omnicoder|Omnicoder]] 16:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Becoming? Anyway, I believe there is a general consensus to delete mods that have no actual work completed? It's very, very easy to come up with an idea and say "I'm going to make a mod now I just need a team to do all the work for me", but most mods don't even get started beyond that point. [[User:Thelonesoldier|Thelonesoldier]] 22:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:11, 27 October 2010
How much actual work do you have done for this mod? Or is this all theoretical? Thelonesoldier 12:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Don't expect a goldsrc mod to do very well in an age where even Source is becoming outdated. --Omnicoder 16:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Becoming? Anyway, I believe there is a general consensus to delete mods that have no actual work completed? It's very, very easy to come up with an idea and say "I'm going to make a mod now I just need a team to do all the work for me", but most mods don't even get started beyond that point. Thelonesoldier 22:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)