Talk:Looping a sound: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TomEdwards (talk | contribs) (→Cue names: new section) |
m (→Goldwave?) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
You have to buy some separate program just to make looping sounds in Hammer? Personally, I think that's really stupid. Why isn't anything like this included with Hammer? | You have to buy some separate program just to make looping sounds in Hammer? Personally, I think that's really stupid. Why isn't anything like this included with Hammer? | ||
[[User:Day32|Day32]] 04:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Day32|Day32]] 04:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Man, there's an unlimited demo version of Goldwave.. that should be enough. --[[User:NykO18|NykO18]] 19:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Cue names == | == Cue names == | ||
It turns out that (in Ep1) the name of the cue doesn't matter, and that only the first one has any effect. You certainly can't have one to start the loop and one to end it. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 13:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | It turns out that (in Ep1) the name of the cue doesn't matter, and that only the first one has any effect. You certainly can't have one to start the loop and one to end it. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 13:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 29 April 2009
Looping MP3s
Since MP3 doesn't save cue information, does this mean that MP3s can never be looped? --Darkhand 15:28, 2 Dec 2008 (PST)
- Yes. You can only loop .wav sounds, sadly. --Craziestdan 15:56, 2 Dec 2008 (PST)
Goldwave?
You have to buy some separate program just to make looping sounds in Hammer? Personally, I think that's really stupid. Why isn't anything like this included with Hammer? Day32 04:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Man, there's an unlimited demo version of Goldwave.. that should be enough. --NykO18 19:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Cue names
It turns out that (in Ep1) the name of the cue doesn't matter, and that only the first one has any effect. You certainly can't have one to start the loop and one to end it. --TomEdwards 13:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)