Talk:FollowEntity(): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TomEdwards (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: (LOL - bad example? I bet CPP means C++, doesn't it?! ;-)--[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 08:55, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT) | : (LOL - bad example? I bet CPP means C++, doesn't it?! ;-)--[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 08:55, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT) | ||
::I added a note at the start of the article. As you may have guessed, I dislike long subheadings immensely. :p --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 09:47, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT) | ::I added a note at the start of the article. As you may have guessed, I dislike long subheadings immensely. :p --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 09:47, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT) | ||
::: why not just use a number then ? ;-) --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 15:47, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 15:47, 5 April 2008
Way out of my depth here, Tom ;-) but in what context / type of file would I expect to find the Syntax example? Would it be possible to add this info to the Syntax section title? eg ... "C++ syntax example" ... that tells me (and anyone else who doesn't even attempt to tackle C++ code) that this article isn't what I'm looking for. Of course, if this function would only be used in - for example- a .cpp file or a .h file, then "CPP syntax example" would be very helpful to noob modders ... see what I mean? --Beeswax 08:55, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT)
- (LOL - bad example? I bet CPP means C++, doesn't it?! ;-)--Beeswax 08:55, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT)
- I added a note at the start of the article. As you may have guessed, I dislike long subheadings immensely. :p --TomEdwards 09:47, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT)
- why not just use a number then ? ;-) --Beeswax 15:47, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT)
- I added a note at the start of the article. As you may have guessed, I dislike long subheadings immensely. :p --TomEdwards 09:47, 5 Apr 2008 (PDT)