Talk:Intermediate Lighting: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Rename this page?)
Line 1: Line 1:
Added a little about the lightmaps. --[[User:RabidMonkey|RabidMonkey]] 11:06, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT)
Added a little about the lightmaps. --[[User:RabidMonkey|RabidMonkey]] 11:06, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT)
'''Suggestion:''' Should this page be renamed to ''Intermediate lighting''? I think it should, because:
#The title "Advanced" makes it sound like these things should be used only attempted by "advanced" mappers. But in my opinion, almost as soon as a mapper can manage to use normal [[light]] entities, they should be graduating to [[light_spot]]s and [[light_environment]]s, because the results are much better but they aren't really that much more complex.
#There is plenty that could be written about lighting that is at a genuinely an "advanced" level. For example, lighting for dramatic expression and mood setting purposes, techniques for correctly lighting characters, etc.
--[[User:Giles|Giles]] 00:37, 17 May 2006 (PDT)

Revision as of 00:37, 17 May 2006

Added a little about the lightmaps. --RabidMonkey 11:06, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT)

Suggestion: Should this page be renamed to Intermediate lighting? I think it should, because:

  1. The title "Advanced" makes it sound like these things should be used only attempted by "advanced" mappers. But in my opinion, almost as soon as a mapper can manage to use normal light entities, they should be graduating to light_spots and light_environments, because the results are much better but they aren't really that much more complex.
  2. There is plenty that could be written about lighting that is at a genuinely an "advanced" level. For example, lighting for dramatic expression and mood setting purposes, techniques for correctly lighting characters, etc.

--Giles 00:37, 17 May 2006 (PDT)