Talk:How to Develop a Map That Works: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
(Merge (re)) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I think they should stay separate because ''working'' and ''good'' are two different things...and introducing so many things at once may not be helpful to new mappers—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' 22:10, 7 Apr 2006 (PDT) | :I think they should stay separate because ''working'' and ''good'' are two different things...and introducing so many things at once may not be helpful to new mappers—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' 22:10, 7 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
::Even after the merger, the article will not be as long as some of the "basic" articles around here.. Like [[Leaks Explained]], for example.. So that't won't be a problem IMO. I just think the articles are so similar they should be merged to one "Guide to successful mapping" or something. [[User:Jupix|Jupix]] 01:37, 8 Apr 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 01:37, 8 April 2006
I tried to edit this page and got
A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was: (SQL query hidden) from within function "SearchUpdate::doUpdate". MySQL returned error "1034: Incorrect key file for table 'mw_searchindex'; try to repair it (localhost)".
the edit was saved though. - NickH
- This happens all over, nothing to post on a page about. --AndrewNeo 11:55, 7 Nov 2005 (PST)
Merge
Merge Complete
- I think they should stay separate because working and good are two different things...and introducing so many things at once may not be helpful to new mappers—ts2do 22:10, 7 Apr 2006 (PDT)
- Even after the merger, the article will not be as long as some of the "basic" articles around here.. Like Leaks Explained, for example.. So that't won't be a problem IMO. I just think the articles are so similar they should be merged to one "Guide to successful mapping" or something. Jupix 01:37, 8 Apr 2006 (PDT)