Talk:VVIS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::But what if "vis" stands for "visibility"? Then the vis should normally be written "Vis" instead, like "VVis". I'd like to know what the inventor of this program called it. --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 07:46, 8 Mar 2006 (PST) | ::But what if "vis" stands for "visibility"? Then the vis should normally be written "Vis" instead, like "VVis". I'd like to know what the inventor of this program called it. --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 07:46, 8 Mar 2006 (PST) | ||
:::Good point, sounds plausible. [[User:Jupix|Jupix]] 23:58, 11 Mar 2006 (PST) | :::Good point, sounds plausible. [[User:Jupix|Jupix]] 23:58, 11 Mar 2006 (PST) | ||
::::I believe it's safe to refer to VVIS as VIS or vis, I always do and everyone know right away what I'm referring to. --[[User:Mark WiseCarver|wisemx]] 04:09, 12 Mar 2006 (PST) |
Revision as of 05:09, 12 March 2006
When i compiled my map with vis it messed up my map. Can anyone help me with this.
- I would but that map is long gone. I haven't used vis since that happened. what actually happened was that after i used vis and them made more changes to the map, none of the changes appeared.Cubedude 17:16, 2 Feb 2006 (PST)
- I have another question about compiling with vis. For water to appear correctly do you have to compile with vis. Cubedude 10:31, 4 Feb 2006 (PST)
So is this compiler called vvis, VVIS, VVis or Vvis? --Andreasen 03:32, 8 Mar 2006 (PST)
- Well, since it's an acronym (though I don't know what from), I'd say VVIS. Jupix 03:35, 8 Mar 2006 (PST)
- But what if "vis" stands for "visibility"? Then the vis should normally be written "Vis" instead, like "VVis". I'd like to know what the inventor of this program called it. --Andreasen 07:46, 8 Mar 2006 (PST)