Talk:Transforming the Multiplayer SDK into Coop: Difference between revisions
Dolphineye (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
--Thomas | --Thomas | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Yes but if it's dedicated, edict 1 is a random client...players cannot go over transitions easily because the server already handles player ents; I think it'd be a better idea to disregard player transitioning altogether and focus on moving everything else to the new map...which this article proposes to work, correct?—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|Talk]] | [mailto:tsdodo@gmail.com @])</sup> 13:26, 19 Nov 2005 (PST) |
Revision as of 14:26, 19 November 2005
How would player restoration work, seeing that the players can change around and stuff in multiplayer?—ts2do (Talk | @) 12:18, 19 Nov 2005 (PST)
You would also run into issues with dedicated servers probably—ts2do (Talk | @) 12:21, 19 Nov 2005 (PST)
@Ts2Do
Well, as far as I know, the player's restoration is not included in the SDK: somewhere in the code, Valve says something like "the players move across transitions another way"'. So I don't know the way they go across transitions, anyway I just know they are restored the same way as entities are.
Regarding the problem of Dedicated Servers, as I said in the article, the clients cannot be restored properly. Knowing that each player has an edict, I could have the following scheme:
- host-player ( edict: 1 )
- client1 ( edict: 2 )
Now if those players go across a transition, I get this:
- the host-player won't have any problem
- the client will.
My "hack" is the following: I basically ask the server "is there any existing player with the edict #2 ?". If the answer is "YES", it would mean there already is a player on the map. If there is an existing player, I tell the server not to override it as this existing player would be the former one ( coming from the transition ). The very last step is to teleport the client to his previous position.
I know this explaination must not be clear... but it is actually hard to explain it... I am not a good teacher.
--Thomas
Yes but if it's dedicated, edict 1 is a random client...players cannot go over transitions easily because the server already handles player ents; I think it'd be a better idea to disregard player transitioning altogether and focus on moving everything else to the new map...which this article proposes to work, correct?—ts2do (Talk | @) 13:26, 19 Nov 2005 (PST)