User talk:Barracuda: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==Template Category==
==Template Category==
Do you have any reasoning for removing templates from the template category? EDIT: Nevermind, I see what you did there. Thanks. [[User:Thelonesoldier|Thelonesoldier]] 22:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Do you have any reasoning for removing templates from the template category? EDIT: Nevermind, I see what you did there. Thanks. [[User:Thelonesoldier|Thelonesoldier]] 22:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
:Ah, you were faster with your edit. Well, that's what I was going to say: They're not removed from the category entirely, but rather automatically moved into the sub-category [[:Category:Notice templates]] through [[Template:Messagebox/start]]. I feel that this is really necessary, because most of these templates are using different HTML/CSS markups, which causes redundancy and an inconsistent look & feel. And a generic all-in-one template category isn't very helpful IMHO. --[[User:Barracuda|Barracuda]] 22:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:48, 17 March 2011

Hey, about the image we both submitted at the same time I didn't revert yours because I wanted mine, yours showed selecting info_player_start instead of info_player_deathmatch --Omnicoder 22:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

I wanted to revert mine anyway :) --Barracuda 22:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Template Category

Do you have any reasoning for removing templates from the template category? EDIT: Nevermind, I see what you did there. Thanks. Thelonesoldier 22:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah, you were faster with your edit. Well, that's what I was going to say: They're not removed from the category entirely, but rather automatically moved into the sub-category Category:Notice templates through Template:Messagebox/start. I feel that this is really necessary, because most of these templates are using different HTML/CSS markups, which causes redundancy and an inconsistent look & feel. And a generic all-in-one template category isn't very helpful IMHO. --Barracuda 22:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)