Talk:List of default AI relationships/table: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:My only (minor) objection is that then the table won't fit on a 1024x768 screen as it currently does. I expect that anyone using Hammer uses a higher resolution anyway, but I'm not sure. But I suppose that's what scroll bars are for. —'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 12:48, 6 Oct 2005 (PDT) | :My only (minor) objection is that then the table won't fit on a 1024x768 screen as it currently does. I expect that anyone using Hammer uses a higher resolution anyway, but I'm not sure. But I suppose that's what scroll bars are for. —'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 12:48, 6 Oct 2005 (PDT) | ||
Is there a way to write the text for the column headers vertically, without resorting to pictures? —'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 12:49, 6 Oct 2005 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:49, 6 October 2005
Maven or AndrewNeo - Rather than a separate key, how about using the left-hand axis of the visual table to display the full class_name? --Greg
- Yeah come on boys, don't be so cryptic. ;-) LOL --wisemx 12:47, 6 Oct 2005 (PDT)
- My only (minor) objection is that then the table won't fit on a 1024x768 screen as it currently does. I expect that anyone using Hammer uses a higher resolution anyway, but I'm not sure. But I suppose that's what scroll bars are for. —Maven (talk) 12:48, 6 Oct 2005 (PDT)
Is there a way to write the text for the column headers vertically, without resorting to pictures? —Maven (talk) 12:49, 6 Oct 2005 (PDT)