Talk:Func nav prefer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(edit suggestion) |
(response) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Likewise, the same applies to [[func_nav_avoid]] (albeit the cost is inverted), yet this is not mentioned anywhere. It would also be preferable to add func_nav_avoid to the See Also section of func_nav_prerequisite, as the prefer and avoid entities go hand-in-hand. | Likewise, the same applies to [[func_nav_avoid]] (albeit the cost is inverted), yet this is not mentioned anywhere. It would also be preferable to add func_nav_avoid to the See Also section of func_nav_prerequisite, as the prefer and avoid entities go hand-in-hand. | ||
[[User:Jakapoa|Jakapoa]] ([[User talk:Jakapoa|talk]]) 16:12, 29 August 2021 (PDT) | [[User:Jakapoa|Jakapoa]] ([[User talk:Jakapoa|talk]]) 16:12, 29 August 2021 (PDT) | ||
: Sounds good to implement, don't have anything to disagree about this yet. - [[User:Orinuse|Orin]] ([[User talk:Orinuse|talk]]) 10:58, 30 August 2021 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 10:58, 30 August 2021
I noticed the See Also section for Func_nav_prerequisite lists func_nav_prefer, but also adds the description "...by decreasing the pathfinding cost within it." This is technically true, but this fact is not mentioned at all on the page for func_nav_prefer. Should this be added in to the Entity Description section of the entity? Exact values can be provided.
Likewise, the same applies to func_nav_avoid (albeit the cost is inverted), yet this is not mentioned anywhere. It would also be preferable to add func_nav_avoid to the See Also section of func_nav_prerequisite, as the prefer and avoid entities go hand-in-hand. Jakapoa (talk) 16:12, 29 August 2021 (PDT)