Talk:Light: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(re) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
: Uhh, I don't see a difference between the two versions (beyond cosmetic), assuming a difference even exists. Also: This is a wiki. If you're not prepared to have other people edit your writing, then you probably shouldn't contribute. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 12:39, 23 Mar 2006 (PST) | : Uhh, I don't see a difference between the two versions (beyond cosmetic), assuming a difference even exists. Also: This is a wiki. If you're not prepared to have other people edit your writing, then you probably shouldn't contribute. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 12:39, 23 Mar 2006 (PST) | ||
:^^ Ditto. The article is not screwed up, it's just went through some layout changes to make it consistent with other entity descriptions. Most of your work is still there. [[User:Jupix|Jupix]] 13:16, 23 Mar 2006 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 14:16, 23 March 2006
wow, i did try to make my entity definition as perfect as possible, yet people need to edit it. the added "style" table is self explanitorry and appears as a drop-down box in hammer editor.
Is it just me does the Custom option not work in Source? I've tried with many different lights and many different patterns and it just doesn't seem to want to work.
Yeah, ive tried that thing too and dont work for me neither --InvaderZim
Is the custom option the one where you use alphabetical letters to create a flicker, fade in, etc. pattern? I could help you with that. --Fiercefighter 17:27, 9 Nov 2005 (PST)
Just so you guys know, i wrote this article a long time ago and now it's all screwed up! I had valuable information in there that is now gone, im very upset. See the 1st version of this article and then look at the ***** that for some reason kept editing it and editing it and editing it (aside from adding stuff, cause thats a good thing but not removing stuff)
- Uhh, I don't see a difference between the two versions (beyond cosmetic), assuming a difference even exists. Also: This is a wiki. If you're not prepared to have other people edit your writing, then you probably shouldn't contribute. --Campaignjunkie (talk) 12:39, 23 Mar 2006 (PST)
- ^^ Ditto. The article is not screwed up, it's just went through some layout changes to make it consistent with other entity descriptions. Most of your work is still there. Jupix 13:16, 23 Mar 2006 (PST)