Bullet Penetration in Counter-Strike: Source: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
== Concluding Remarks == | == Concluding Remarks == | ||
While the results show that | While the results show that thin bullet-proof glass may not be in our reach, it is useful to know that glass becomes more resistant when it is included in an entity. It is also possible to sandwich toolsblockbullets on either side or in between two glass brushes. However, sandwiched layers contained in the same entity: {|||} is less effective at stopping bullets than having each layer in a seperate entity: {|}{|}{|}. | ||
In general, sandwiching without entity use is no more efficient than a single thick block. For example: you need seven 1 inch panels of concrete with 2 inch spacing to stop an AWP round. The total thickness is 7*1+6*2=19 inches, which is 1 inch thicker than a solid block needs to be. | In general, sandwiching without entity use is no more efficient than a single thick block. For example: you need seven 1 inch panels of concrete with 2 inch spacing to stop an AWP round. The total thickness is 7*1+6*2=19 inches, which is 1 inch thicker than a solid block needs to be. | ||
For brushes with different materials on each face the penetration depth seems to match the value for the material through which the bullet entered the brush. My test example was a brush entity of depth 18 inches with one side glass and the other toolsblockbullets. AWP rounds penetrated the brush when shot from the glass side (entity penetration depth 24), but were stopped when shot from the toolsblockbullets side. | For brushes with different materials on each face the penetration depth seems to match the value for the material through which the bullet entered the brush. My test example was a brush entity of depth 18 inches with one side glass and the other toolsblockbullets. AWP rounds penetrated the brush when shot from the glass side (entity penetration depth 24), but were stopped when shot from the toolsblockbullets side. |
Revision as of 17:49, 23 August 2005
This document aims to provide detailed information about what parameters affect the penetration depth of bullets from the various weapons in Counter-Strike:Source. The most important result from this study is the fact that there is no simple way to make a 1 inch thick wall that stops any bullet. It is concievable that this could be achieved using code modifications, which remains a topic for future study.
Rudimentary Results
The following table gives the shallowest depth of a sigle brush that completely blocks the incoming bullet. The brushes were six faced with dimensions 80x104xN and with each face set to the given material.
Weapon | glass/prodwndwa | tools/toolsblockbullets tools/toolsnodraw |
M3 | 1 | 1 |
XM1014 | 1 | 1 |
USP | 15 | 6 |
Mac-10 | 15 | 6 |
UMP | 15 | 6 |
TMP | 20 | 8 |
Glock | 21 | 9 |
Elites | 21 | 9 |
MP5 | 21 | 9 |
P228 | 25 | 10 |
Five-Seven | 30 | 12 |
P90 | 30 | 12 |
Deagle | 30 | 12 |
Galil | 35 | 14 |
Famas | 35 | 14 |
M4-A1 | 35 | 14 |
SG 552 | 35 | 14 |
SG 550 | 35 | 14 |
M249 | 35 | 14 |
AK-47 | 39 | 16 |
Scout | 39 | 16 |
Aug | 39 | 16 |
G3SG1 | 39 | 16 |
AWP | 45 | 18 |
The results of this are somewhat troubling: Toolsblockbullets does not live up to its name. Even worse is the fact that nodraw is just as good at stopping bullets. Perhaps the material definitions reveal values that can be changed to affect the penetration distance.
Dependence on SurfaceProperties.txt
Upon further testing, it has become clear that the penetration depth depends on the gamematerial field of the surface property entry of the given material.
The table below was generated by adding a new entry to scripts/surfaceproperties_cs.txt:
"toughstuff" { "density" "1000000000" "elasticity" "1000000000" "friction" "1000000000" "dampening" "1000000000" "stepleft" "Glass.StepLeft" "stepright" "Glass.StepRight" "scraperough" "Glass.ScrapeRough" "scrapesmooth" "Glass.ScrapeSmooth" "impacthard" "Glass.ImpactHard" "impactsoft" "Glass.ImpactSoft" "bulletimpact" "Glass.BulletImpact" // "strain" "Glass.Strain" "break" "Glass.Break" "audioreflectivity" "0.66" "audiohardnessfactor" "1.0" "audioroughnessfactor" "0.0" "gamematerial" "D" }
During testing the density, elasticity, etc. were modified and shown to have no effect of penetration depth. The only property that affected the penetration depth was gamematerial.
To use this new surfaceproperty, materials/glass/bulletproof.vmt was created:
LightmappedGeneric { "$basetexture" "glass\prodwndwa" "$translucent" "1" "$nocull" "1" "$envmap" "env_cubemap" "$envmapmask" "glass\offwndwb_ref" "$surfaceprop" "toughstuff" "$crackmaterial" "glass\offwndwb_break" }
Finally, several brushes ranging from a depth of 45 to 14 were created and each gamematerial type found in scripts/surfaceproperties.txt tested for penetration depth.
AWP inches | gamematerial | general description |
18 | C | Concrete |
18 | P | Computer |
23 | D | Dirt |
23 | V | Vent |
30 | T | Tile |
45 | -,B,F,G,H,I,L,M,O,S,T,X,Y | Everything Else: Flesh, Grates, Plastic, Metal, Liquids, Glass... |
>45 | W | Wood |
Brush entities require the smaller of 24 inches and the value associated with the gamematerial. For example a brush of toolsblockbullets texture is used in a func_breakable. Since toolsblockbullets is type C, 18 is less than 24 so we use 18. This was tested on a subset of gamematerial types and using func_breakable and func_wall entities.
Note surfaceprop "default" has gamematerial C. Thus bullets penetrate nodraw, blockbullets, etc. as if they were hitting concrete.
Concluding Remarks
While the results show that thin bullet-proof glass may not be in our reach, it is useful to know that glass becomes more resistant when it is included in an entity. It is also possible to sandwich toolsblockbullets on either side or in between two glass brushes. However, sandwiched layers contained in the same entity: {|||} is less effective at stopping bullets than having each layer in a seperate entity: {|}{|}{|}.
In general, sandwiching without entity use is no more efficient than a single thick block. For example: you need seven 1 inch panels of concrete with 2 inch spacing to stop an AWP round. The total thickness is 7*1+6*2=19 inches, which is 1 inch thicker than a solid block needs to be.
For brushes with different materials on each face the penetration depth seems to match the value for the material through which the bullet entered the brush. My test example was a brush entity of depth 18 inches with one side glass and the other toolsblockbullets. AWP rounds penetrated the brush when shot from the glass side (entity penetration depth 24), but were stopped when shot from the toolsblockbullets side.