Talk:Prop physics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TomEdwards (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Robin Walker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is there any wisdom in creating a list of all HL2 and CSS props, along with their type, for easy reference? Or would it be too large and cumbersome? --[[User:Charron|Charron]] 13:06, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT) | Is there any wisdom in creating a list of all HL2 and CSS props, along with their type, for easy reference? Or would it be too large and cumbersome? --[[User:Charron|Charron]] 13:06, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
:That was what I was thinking of. Some way of knowing from Hammer. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 23:49, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT) | :That was what I was thinking of. Some way of knowing from Hammer. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 23:49, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
::Right now there isn't. Hammer is being updated to have a much better model browser, and it'll deal with these kinds of issues in that. -- [[User:Robin Walker|Robin Walker]] 14:35, 15 Jul 2005 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:35, 15 July 2005
Is there any way of telling if a model can become a prop_physics other than trial and error? --TomEdwards 11:34, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- I'll add a section about propdata, which controls it. -- Robin Walker 11:41, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT)
Is there any wisdom in creating a list of all HL2 and CSS props, along with their type, for easy reference? Or would it be too large and cumbersome? --Charron 13:06, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- That was what I was thinking of. Some way of knowing from Hammer. --TomEdwards 23:49, 14 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- Right now there isn't. Hammer is being updated to have a much better model browser, and it'll deal with these kinds of issues in that. -- Robin Walker 14:35, 15 Jul 2005 (PDT)