User talk:Sugarblood: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→minor edits: new section) |
Sugarblood (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:Info.png|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi {{ROOTPAGENAME}}! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "[[w:Help:Minor edit|Minor edit]]" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typographical error or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the <em>meaning</em> of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. --[[User:Nescius|Nescius]] ([[User talk:Nescius|talk]]) 04:42, 21 August 2025 (PDT) | [[File:Info.png|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi {{ROOTPAGENAME}}! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "[[w:Help:Minor edit|Minor edit]]" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typographical error or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the <em>meaning</em> of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. --[[User:Nescius|Nescius]] ([[User talk:Nescius|talk]]) 04:42, 21 August 2025 (PDT) | ||
Ah, good to know! I was under an incorrect assumption, then--Thanks :D --[[User:Sugarblood|Sugarblood]] ([[User talk:Sugarblood|talk]]) 16:28, 21 August 2025 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:28, 21 August 2025
minor edits
Hi Sugarblood! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typographical error or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. --Nescius (talk) 04:42, 21 August 2025 (PDT)
Ah, good to know! I was under an incorrect assumption, then--Thanks :D --Sugarblood (talk) 16:28, 21 August 2025 (PDT)