Template talk:Minor Spammer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Re-added my topic (because I regretted undoing the revisions where it existed). I also added more info on top) |
m (tweaked punctuation) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:C. ''How would you even determine spam or "problem posting" as minor? I mean there isn't any scale to refer to. | :C. ''How would you even determine spam or "problem posting" as minor? I mean there isn't any scale to refer to. | ||
I mean- this is useless. There is absolutely no need to be exact. Like | I mean- this is useless. There is absolutely no need to be exact. Like if someone is seen spamming or "problem posting", even to a minor degree, then just use template:spammer. It does what it needs to just as well as this template does. | ||
Just... trivial and unnecessary. That is what this template is. | Just... trivial and unnecessary. That is what this template is. | ||
[[User:Mailmanmickey|Mailmanmickey]] ([[User talk:Mailmanmickey|talk]]) 13:23, 31 August 2022 (PDT) | [[User:Mailmanmickey|Mailmanmickey]] ([[User talk:Mailmanmickey|talk]]) 13:23, 31 August 2022 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:26, 1 September 2022
Mark for Deletion
This is particularly niche. Template:Spammer is enough. Pinsplash (talk) 10:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Illogical Template
Why does this template exist? I mean, because:
- A. There is no reason (logically speaking) to mark someone as a minor spammer or problem poster.
- B. Template:spammer fills the role of this template anyway.
- C. How would you even determine spam or "problem posting" as minor? I mean there isn't any scale to refer to.
I mean- this is useless. There is absolutely no need to be exact. Like if someone is seen spamming or "problem posting", even to a minor degree, then just use template:spammer. It does what it needs to just as well as this template does.
Just... trivial and unnecessary. That is what this template is.
Mailmanmickey (talk) 13:23, 31 August 2022 (PDT)