Talk:Steam/Steam Chat: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If something on the page is totaly pointless, can it be deleted? Im talking about a duplicate bug being posted. The poster didnt even leave their name. [[User:Etalon|Etalon]] | If something on the page is totaly pointless, can it be deleted? Im talking about a duplicate bug being posted. The poster didnt even leave their name. [[User:Etalon|Etalon]] | ||
:If there's no contribution, as in "The text disappears if the link would be viewable" is the submitted one and the new one is "uh liek sum1 screwed upp!!!!!!11 links i cnat see", then yes. However, if it brings new information to light then it should be merged into the existing report. --[[User:Alph Tech STUART|Alph Tech STUART]] 22:31, 6 Feb 2006 (PST) | :If there's no contribution, as in "The text disappears if the link would be viewable" is the submitted one and the new one is "uh liek sum1 screwed upp!!!!!!11 links i cnat see", then yes. However, if it brings new information to light then it should be merged into the existing report. --[[User:Alph Tech STUART|Alph Tech STUART]] 22:31, 6 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
We ought to start a not-an-issue section to move issues to, like the clipboard issue someone reported. | |||
Revision as of 16:19, 7 February 2006
Yay, I started a trend. --Alph Tech STUART 19:39, 31 Jan 2006 (PST)
If something on the page is totaly pointless, can it be deleted? Im talking about a duplicate bug being posted. The poster didnt even leave their name. Etalon
- If there's no contribution, as in "The text disappears if the link would be viewable" is the submitted one and the new one is "uh liek sum1 screwed upp!!!!!!11 links i cnat see", then yes. However, if it brings new information to light then it should be merged into the existing report. --Alph Tech STUART 22:31, 6 Feb 2006 (PST)
We ought to start a not-an-issue section to move issues to, like the clipboard issue someone reported.