Talk:Decompiling Maps: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Better the make it public that VMEX's system sucks then have a few people spread it by word of mouth. Maybe it'll get changed faster this way. Public knowledge is the best way to get things changed. Its the same theory that all these books are comming out now a days about hacking and computer security. --[[User:Red comet|Red Comet]] 13:57, 4 Feb 2006 (PST) | |||
Should this article really be discussing how to bypass the "no_decomp" 1 flag? It's purposely violating the author's intent when you remove that keyvalue. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 13:44, 4 Feb 2006 (PST) | Should this article really be discussing how to bypass the "no_decomp" 1 flag? It's purposely violating the author's intent when you remove that keyvalue. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 13:44, 4 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 4 February 2006
Better the make it public that VMEX's system sucks then have a few people spread it by word of mouth. Maybe it'll get changed faster this way. Public knowledge is the best way to get things changed. Its the same theory that all these books are comming out now a days about hacking and computer security. --Red Comet 13:57, 4 Feb 2006 (PST)
Should this article really be discussing how to bypass the "no_decomp" 1 flag? It's purposely violating the author's intent when you remove that keyvalue. --Campaignjunkie (talk) 13:44, 4 Feb 2006 (PST)