Valve Developer Community talk:Support: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


Respected, Honorable, Highly Regarded, or Admired&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]'''&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|Talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[mailto:tsdodo@gmail.com @])</sup> 18:01, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)
Respected, Honorable, Highly Regarded, or Admired&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]'''&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|Talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[mailto:tsdodo@gmail.com @])</sup> 18:01, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)
* I just think those words are being 'honorific'. Though I suppose this may be the point of the article.. I'll go with just 'regarded developers'. --[[User:AndrewNeo|AndrewNeo]] 18:02, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)

Revision as of 19:02, 28 November 2005

Moved to main namespace and cleared talk page. --AndrewNeo 17:56, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)

How bout "Valve Developer Community:Respected Developers"—ts2do (Talk | @) 17:55, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)

  • Okay, we shouold definately move it into the VDC namespace (didn't think of that) but I don't know if 'respected' is the right word. (Notable either, so bust out the thesaurus!) How about 'prominent developers'? --AndrewNeo 17:58, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)

Respected, Honorable, Highly Regarded, or Admired—ts2do (Talk | @) 18:01, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)

  • I just think those words are being 'honorific'. Though I suppose this may be the point of the article.. I'll go with just 'regarded developers'. --AndrewNeo 18:02, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)