Talk:Skip: Difference between revisions
MossyBucket (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(didn't read revision before two cent post) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:After doing some tweaking, I think what it means is say you have several entities that are grouped together, but not everything is aligned in agreement, so moving it around the map isn't always a clean process. If you surround all entities in a box textured with ''skip'', and add the box to the group, the entities will now freeze in the skip box's origin, kind of like a popsicle stick in an ice cube, if you will, the popsicle stick being the entities and the ice cube being the ''skip'' box. I hope that makes a little sense, I'm terrible at explaining things. :P --[[User:Mattshu|Mattshu]] 02:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC) | :After doing some tweaking, I think what it means is say you have several entities that are grouped together, but not everything is aligned in agreement, so moving it around the map isn't always a clean process. If you surround all entities in a box textured with ''skip'', and add the box to the group, the entities will now freeze in the skip box's origin, kind of like a popsicle stick in an ice cube, if you will, the popsicle stick being the entities and the ice cube being the ''skip'' box. I hope that makes a little sense, I'm terrible at explaining things. :P --[[User:Mattshu|Mattshu]] 02:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, this is what I've already explained (and by now using this technique is pretty much my speciality) but I was hoping that somebody could shed some light on the ''facilitates grouping/copying'' bit, because if it's just a left-over from poor phrasing, it's ''really'' poorly phrased. --[[User:MossyBucket|MossyBucket (formerly Andreasen)]] 02:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC) | ::Yes, this is what I've already explained (and by now using this technique is pretty much my speciality) but I was hoping that somebody could shed some light on the ''facilitates grouping/copying'' bit, because if it's just a left-over from poor phrasing, it's ''really'' poorly phrased. --[[User:MossyBucket|MossyBucket (formerly Andreasen)]] 02:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::Oh, d'oh. I didn't realize you edited the main page with a revised explanation of it. --[[User:Mattshu|Mattshu]] 02:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:58, 23 February 2011
Barracuda added "the brush face which is textured with it." to make the description more precise, but sometimes, when one or all the sides of a brush entity is textured with it, it seems to remove more than that as well, so while I don't know much at all about these things, I'm sceptic about the accuracy of that statement. --MossyBucket (formerly Andreasen) 01:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Mattshu, you previously wished that I elaborated on a section of this article, and although you said that you later got it, the wording still confused me, so I elaborated. However, in doing so, I also removed things I did not understand: It said that enveloping objects inside a skip brush will also help group and specifically copy these components in large maps, and I just don't see how. If somebody knows, please explain how. --MossyBucket (formerly Andreasen) 02:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- After doing some tweaking, I think what it means is say you have several entities that are grouped together, but not everything is aligned in agreement, so moving it around the map isn't always a clean process. If you surround all entities in a box textured with skip, and add the box to the group, the entities will now freeze in the skip box's origin, kind of like a popsicle stick in an ice cube, if you will, the popsicle stick being the entities and the ice cube being the skip box. I hope that makes a little sense, I'm terrible at explaining things. :P --Mattshu 02:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, this is what I've already explained (and by now using this technique is pretty much my speciality) but I was hoping that somebody could shed some light on the facilitates grouping/copying bit, because if it's just a left-over from poor phrasing, it's really poorly phrased. --MossyBucket (formerly Andreasen) 02:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, d'oh. I didn't realize you edited the main page with a revised explanation of it. --Mattshu 02:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, this is what I've already explained (and by now using this technique is pretty much my speciality) but I was hoping that somebody could shed some light on the facilitates grouping/copying bit, because if it's just a left-over from poor phrasing, it's really poorly phrased. --MossyBucket (formerly Andreasen) 02:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)