Talk:$lod: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Collisions are handled entirely on the server. LODs are handled purely on the client. That isn't always true (clientside ragdolls), but it's a near enough approximation. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 16:54, 1 May 2008 (PDT) | :::Collisions are handled entirely on the server. LODs are handled purely on the client. That isn't always true (clientside ragdolls), but it's a near enough approximation. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 16:54, 1 May 2008 (PDT) | ||
==Removing meshes== | |||
Well, this sucks: | Well, this sucks: | ||
Revision as of 07:39, 10 November 2010
Using bonetreecollapse & replacebone
How do Ragdoll Physics and Skeletal Animations cope when the model's bonetree is modified at a given Render Distance from the Player? What happens in multiplayer games ? --Beeswax 08:23, 1 May 2008 (PDT)
- LODs are only used on the client, i.e. for visual purposes. --TomEdwards 12:51, 1 May 2008 (PDT)
- That's what I thought too; the skeleton/bones are not rendered at any LOD, they are used only to deform the Mesh and (jointed) Collisionmodel. --Beeswax 15:42, 1 May 2008 (PDT)
- Are you suggesting that in multiplayer games these bone_$lod commands are ignored, or a model that uses them would not function properly ? --Beeswax 15:42, 1 May 2008 (PDT)
- I am surprised that the ragdoll and animation systems are flexible enough to deal with missing bones at all ... ? --Beeswax 15:42, 1 May 2008 (PDT)
- Collisions are handled entirely on the server. LODs are handled purely on the client. That isn't always true (clientside ragdolls), but it's a near enough approximation. --TomEdwards 16:54, 1 May 2008 (PDT)
Removing meshes
Well, this sucks:
using removemodel "namehere" results in giving me ERROR: 'EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION' (assert: 1) in GUIstudiomdl...
using replacemodel "namehere" blank results in studiomdl not finishing the job, cause it can't find "blank.smd"
I am using the Orange Box Compiler and the meshes I want to remove are parts of $bodygroups - could that be the reason? --Jike 14:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)